[tw5] Re: A quiet Date

Ciao S.S. Ohhh. *Very exciting*! I'm testing. I think its good piece of work in a bunch of ways. Not least its nicely useful and shed's a lot of light on TW date workings that is very helpful. The Godzilla size *regex* is also interesting. I was surprised to see a regex being able to do, in

[tw5] Re: A quiet Date

I'm glad Josiah made a post yesterday: Query -- Changing creation date in a human actionable way? -- #creationDate I thought, of course this <> macro can do it! But it couldn't!! Reason: The date result was being output

[tw5] Re: A quiet Date

Well, I was playing with the Set Widget Tester for attribute precedence tiddler that I posted a few days ago, and realized that in the *$set* widget, the *field* attribute takes precedence over the *index* attribute, so

[tw5] Re: A quiet Date

Hi S.S, Great job! well documented. Good flexibility to adopt many formats users may like. Cheers Mohammad On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 10:08:29 PM UTC+4:30, S. S. wrote: > > > It's been a quiet day today in TiddlyWikiLand. > > I'd like to share a small macro I've been working on the past

[tw5] Re: A quiet Date

S S, Nice work and nicely documented. This certainly addresses a gap in date handling with formats similar to those used for new journal entries, I think it will suit many users. It will take time for me to decide if I would adopt it on a regular basis because I have favored using the full