El martes, 9 de agosto de 2016, 0:16:27 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió:
> I notice that the "Pack Database" option doesn't have a button associated
> with it. At least not on mine. I can include a snapshot if that is helpful.
>
> Also, if there was a "Pack Database" button, would there also be a
I notice that the "Pack Database" option doesn't have a button associated
with it. At least not on mine. I can include a snapshot if that is helpful.
Also, if there was a "Pack Database" button, would there also be a "Unpack
Data Tiddler" somewhere?
Thanks!
Mark
--
You received this message
El lunes, 1 de agosto de 2016, 16:49:11 (UTC+2), ParisWiki escribió:
>
> Thank you for your explanations.
>
You are welcome.
>
> For me, any database contains records, each record with (pre?) defined
> fields.
>
> I saw that the database name is defined when loading the wiki. But how and
Thank you for your explanations.
It is certainly clearer, but I am still missing some points.
I understand that your modified tiddlywiki is embarking the "motor" for a
data base. Fine.
For me, any database contains records, each record with (pre?) defined
fields.
I saw that the database
I didn't mentioned it, and I'm not sure if someone has noticed it but the site
it's actually just a tiddlywiky with a custom theme. That demonstrates how
powerful tiddlywiki is!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe
El domingo, 31 de julio de 2016, 20:48:00 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió:
>
> Thought of another question. Of course.
>
>
As many as you want.
> If I want to transfer to another machine/browser, is there a mechanism for
> doing that?
>
> I have plans to implement an easier mechanism, but you can
Thought of another question. Of course.
If I want to transfer to another machine/browser, is there a mechanism for
doing that?
Thanks!
Mark
On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 6:13:20 PM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:
>
> Hello tiddliwikiers,
>
> Recently I have been thinking about tiddliwiki and
El domingo, 31 de julio de 2016, 19:15:32 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió:
>
> Hello Danielo,
>
> I have some questions.
>
Cool!
>
> Is there any advantage to this system if you don't sync it with a couchDB
> system?
>
Not as much as using a remote coucDB but yes, there are some:
1. You
Hello Danielo,
I have some questions.
Is there any advantage to this system if you don't sync it with a couchDB
system?
How close did you come to the $50 mark during your test phase with Cloudant
(how much data will be typical?).
If we're using Cloudant, don't we have the same privacy
Very tiny correction
"which uses creates"
should be
"which creates"
On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 4:13:45 AM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:
>
>
> Did someone read the FAQ section ?
>
> I'm very interested about how clear the information is, and about how much
> of it should be on the main
El domingo, 31 de julio de 2016, 13:33:57 (UTC+2), RichardWilliamSmith
escribió:
>
> Hi Danielo,
>
> I'm currently trying to get syncing working with a local couchDB.
>
> I can set the address http://127.0.0.1:5984 and the name of a db that
> doesn't exist, then save and reload, and the
Hi Jed,
I agree entirely - this is convergent with my previous ramblings about
ipfs. I think eventually you and I get equal access to a shared global
namespace (of the whole internet) into which we publish everything. Private
communication is all by encryption.
RR
On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at
I am going to have to take some very close looks at this. If I am right we
may be able to make this an alternate way to use twederation. It wouldn't
be a replacement to what we have now since it requires a server but I think
that having something like this could work well with what we have by
Hi Danielo,
I'm currently trying to get syncing working with a local couchDB.
I can set the address http://127.0.0.1:5984 and the name of a db that
doesn't exist, then save and reload, and the database gets created in couch
- so it can 'see' my couch - but no records get created with new
Did someone read the FAQ section ?
I'm very interested about how clear the information there is, and about how
much of it should be on the main page rather than the FAQ.
Also I'm very interested about knowing if it is clear or not.
Regards
--
You received this message because you are
El domingo, 31 de julio de 2016, 12:27:22 (UTC+2), RichardWilliamSmith
escribió:
>
> Hi JCG,
>
> It's not my place to reply on Danielo's behalf but when he says
> "everything is stored on the company's servers" he means Evernote, the
> problem is with imperfect (though very good!) English.
>
El domingo, 31 de julio de 2016, 10:53:09 (UTC+2), ParisWiki escribió:
>
> Hi Danielo,
>
> I must say that I am totally lost !
>
Hello ParisWiki, thank you very much for your feedback, I really need
several points of view because when I write instructions I'm too excited,
and sometimes I'm
Hi JCG,
It's not my place to reply on Danielo's behalf but when he says "everything
is stored on the company's servers" he means Evernote, the problem is with
imperfect (though very good!) English.
When he writes;
"You already know and love Evernote, we know it. It is comfortable, it
>
Hi Danielo,
I must say that I am totally lost !
First you speak about Notestorm. Is it the same as David Gifford's ?
Apparently not, but what are the differences? Do you mean in fact NoteSelf ?
Second you say "NoteSelf does not require any installation". Fine, but what
about Couch or Pouch
19 matches
Mail list logo
