[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hi Lost Admin Happy to see my TW-daughter featured on your baby project :–) And it is o.k. you call me TE – I recognized myself instantly. Happy parenting and adopting everyone! Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Ciao Lost Admin Thank you for that detailed outlay. Truly I think better knowing what people are doing with TW and its "Children" will do masses to get it appreciated more. Both by "us"and by "them" (potential new users). And your Bonus Point bears repeating ... Lost Admin wrote: > As a

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

If it makes you feel any better Josiah (can I just call you Joss?), As a result of you all teaching me how to do things with TiddlyWiki I have 5 separate "daughter" wikis. 4 are doing quite well and 1 is still a baby. Only the baby is truely public for you to see. 1) A Wiki to help me keep

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hi, On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 2:34:46 AM UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> >> We spend very little time assessing whether Mother's Children succeeded. >> > > I agree with this and it is possibly a huge problem. One problem is that > we don't know if it is a huge problem. One

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

@TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > We spend very little time assessing whether Mother's Children succeeded. > I agree with this and it is possibly a huge problem. One problem is that we don't know if it is a huge problem. One problem we *do* know is that we don't have the tools for such assessment. I

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Ciao Greg Its likely mostly because I use a format most people never do. I have three desktop screens. One always in portrait. Its very good for bringing out the devil you never thought you had :-). Josiah On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 23:23:32 UTC+2, Greg Davis wrote: > > Thanks Josiah, > >

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Thanks Josiah, Intersting, at 320 by 480 and 360 by 640 and 768 by 1024 in "Reponsive Design Mode" it goes into TiddlyWiki's default "mobile mode" with menu over content. At least that happens on my PC. It has been awhile since discussions on designing for mobile (phone) use. I don't remember

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

rather than bleed it gets cut in portrait. its not a big deal. what ratio is the USER using? That is what matters unless they want folk reading it on mobile phones. On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:55:59 UTC+2, Greg Davis wrote: > > I think if you toggle to the menu in the right sidebar, it is

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

I think if you toggle to the menu in the right sidebar, it is useable. At least appears to be when viewed in small portrait screen in Firefox's Redponsive Design Mode. Greg On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 3:42:12 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > They work well on standard widescreens (in

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

They work well on standard widescreens (in portrait not so good as your get bleed form the menu). Its good to see them though! The MAIN point is they do what the user needs. I wish we got to see these everyday. Everyday they are used. Josiah On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:29:32 UTC+2, Greg

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hello Josiah, Well, if you're looking for examples of Tiddlywikis. Helped a friend create a couple. They don't quite follow standard TiddlyWiki design, they grew bigger than I initially envisioned. (They also need some updating.) They were meant to be downloaded for reference off-line. They

Re: [tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Ciao Arlen It could include that. But I was mostly thinking about the contradiction between the "bespokeism" that we, in practice, strongly encourage, contrasted with a paucity of tangible completed TWs to look at. Given ALL the work that is going in daily to help folk solve issues there is

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Lol. I'm obscure, I guess. I kinda mean that we do much work in this group helping get a TW to work (using the baseline of the standard release) ... but we RARELY see the results in completed TWs. I do think its an issue for wider uptake. I don't think most users want to have to create a TW,

Re: [tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

To take your question literally, you are asking about forks and spinoffs of Tiddlywiki. Are there any that are active? On Jun 28, 2017 15:15, "PMario" wrote: > Hi, > I have absolutely no clue, what you are talking about here!? > -m > > -- > You received this message because

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hi, I have absolutely no clue, what you are talking about here!? -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To