[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-30 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
Dear Guillermo, I think I have found the root cause of this problem and I have posted an issue about it: #2514 The fix is quite easy, but it requires an update of the core. It is everything detailed on the issue. Regards. -- You

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-29 Thread RichardWilliamSmith
Hi Danielo, That would be great - I am (slowly) learning js and, as I say, I'd like to see if I can get pouchDB and TW to play together in a service worker. Naturally I will share anything I 'discover' with the group. Regards, Richard -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-29 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
Hello RichardWilliamSmith , I love to see that you remember that I was working on that. Which is quite curious, because I have been thinking today about releasing it soon, in it's current state. To be honest, that plugin was a victim of being too ambitious from my side. The plugin is on a

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-27 Thread RichardWilliamSmith
Hi Danielo, Glad to see you around on the board again - did you ever get any further with your PouchDB adapter? Is is in a working state? I'd love to see if I can get it working inside a service worker. Regards, Richard On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 5:38:45 AM UTC+10, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-27 Thread Guillermo Valle
The text doesn't download after I open it. It doesn't complain in the console either. It doesnt seem to send the right request to the server. The only request I see sent are the StoryList ones. On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 9:38:45 PM UTC+2, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > That is what a lazy

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-27 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I tried it as well. The text never seems to arrive. Mark On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 12:38:45 PM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > That is what a lazy loaded tiddler is, a tiddler without the text field. > Once you open it the text download starts. if you are getting an empty > tiddler

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-27 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
That is what a lazy loaded tiddler is, a tiddler without the text field. Once you open it the text download starts. if you are getting an empty tiddler after a while check the browser's console, maybe you are running into CORS problems. Regards -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-25 Thread Guillermo Valle
Thanks for the answer! That seems to be what I'm looking for. However, I tried the instructions here: http://tiddlywiki.com/static/LazyLoading.html , and it doesn't seem to be working, I get the tiddlers empty, without the text field. :/ On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 6:14:19 PM UTC+1, Mark S.

[tw] Re: Options for server-based TiddlyWiki

2016-07-25 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Look on TiddlyWiki.com for "LazyLoading". There are instructions for running node.js so that tiddlers are only served when they are needed (or at least that's how I understood it). Also, you might try AndTidWiki if you have an android device for single file viewing. It allows your text to