Hello,
In order to upgrade from 2.6.2 I understand there is only one
option :
to download a fresh 2.6.4 and then to import the tiddlers.
Since it is not so easy when a TW is tweaked, I was wondering
if somebody could write a plugin with the new upgrade core code
packed inside
(and some javascript
Is there any reason why simply downloading and using the newest
TiddlySaver.jar isn't sufficient to upgrade?
I did that, and my tiddly is still functioning, but nothing seems to be any
different.
Maybe I was already using the latest, since I just started with tiddly this
March, and just grabbed
I'm just back from holiday, and wanted to say that TiddlyWiki's death
is greatly exaggerated. We'll find a way to work around the
restrictions that browsers have placed on the upgrade/import
functionality.
Osmosoft continues to invest in TiddlyWiki, both directly and as part
of our work in
Hi All,
As far as I know we don't have a process like voting.
But I am very much in favour of, and so would vote for, the suggestion
from whatever to have a default download for the latest stable
version, and optional downloads for newer (AND older) versions
addressed by their version number
On Aug 10, 5:54 pm, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the release of version 2.6.3 of TiddlyWiki.
[snip]
Any problems, please report them in this thread, or alternatively
raise an issue on github.
Given the apparent confusion with this release I'm confused on
Chris,
the issue with deprecated functions is that wikifyPlain() was
accidentally removed rather than just deprecated - this is fixed in
2.6.4.
As for waiting for 2.6.4, there is now a tentative 2.6.4 released (see
tiddlywiki-group-dev) which you can use. The reason that 2.6.4 is not
fully
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Martin Budden wrote:
the issue with deprecated functions is that wikifyPlain() was
accidentally removed rather than just deprecated - this is fixed in
2.6.4.
Okay I'll use that to package up a tiddlywebwiki.
Did you see in another thread[1] where I pointed out that
I'm not sure if I understand the difference between a fully
announced and tentative release.
The difference is that we are not yet recommending that general users
upgrade. Only developer users should upgrade. I know that new users
get 2.6.4, but new users tend not to have plugin compatibility
On Aug 16, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Julio wrote:
I also get worried when this thinking surfaces and get curious as to
why.
Maybe it can better help us in our tw quest...
Sometimes as humans we tend to become very disenchanted
when our creativity or the ability to do so dwindles.
I'm not saying
Hi!
I have a few suggestions.
Instead of having simply empty.html, why not use versions in name,
like empty263.html? That way, you could use versioning like File-
Hippo.
For example, on tiddlywiki.com, you could have the normal download
page with the latest final/stable version, but you could also
Just to be clear, just because the upgrade feature is not working - it
does not mean the product doesn't work on popular browsers. As
Tobias points out it is possible to download an empty TiddlyWiki 2.6.3
and import content into there. TiddlyWiki still allows you to save
content to itself which is
Dear All,
Please, please stop discussing.
Can't you see this whole issue seriously hurts TiddlyWiki, and hurts
the community?
Every day this lasts longer the damage becomes bigger.
So, be a man and acknowledge that this version was released too early
and withdraw it.
AND replace the download-site
Ton,
I'm not sure why discussing a problem hurts TW and the community.
Surely it's best to be open with any problems.
I also don't really understand the reasoning behind reverting to
2.6.2. It's not that the upgrade functionality became broken in 2.6.3,
it's that the upgrade functionality that
It seems to me that when the upgrade cannot be upgraded using the
popular browsers then the program is indeed ill if not dead. Is this
problem going to be fixed??
Iain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send
On Upgrading...
I never really understood the need of a dedicated, internal updgrade
process. Why not just import all tiddlers from an existing tiddlywiki
into a plain TiddlyWiki of the new version? If there are plugin
errors, you will sure see them.
Also, I don't think it is reasonable to
On Aug 15, 12:50 pm, Paulo Soares psoares...@gmail.com wrote:
Under Linux I tried Firefox, Chromium, Opera and Rekonq and all of
them refused to update an empty TW. Should I try another OS also?
It seems that the security on ajax requests has changed yet again and
this is caused by a slightly
On Aug 15, 1:50 pm, Paulo Soares psoares...@gmail.com wrote:
On a side note, I guess this finally answers a question that has been
bothering me for some time now: TW is dead! ...
This seems to be rather a statement than a question :)
... It has been a pleasant
ride but now it's over. Thank
Tryed an update via FF5 from 2.6.2 to 2.6.3 where I received a popup
with the message
error with the new source code.
Tryed out the update with IE8. It seemed to be working but all my ä, ö
and ü signs were broken.
After that I had the idea to update it with an old FFportable version
(2.0) and
Paulo,
your statement that TW is dead without explanation is rather
provocative. My view is that it is still very useful in its niche,
although that niche has changed with time and with other developments
on the web (not least TiddlySpace). Perhaps you no longer find it
useful, but that does not
Hello all and sorry for my incoherence below if indeed the case,
I've also had a bit of problems with FF5 trying to upgrade.
However, as per suggestions on the groups I have a portable version of
FF and all seems fine.
I will be content for now until the issue gets resolved.
... It has been a
Mans,
I tried your suggestion to use an earlier version of Firefox. I
downloaded the PortableApps.com version of Firefox36 and loaded it
using wine (this is on Linux). BTW, this version of Firefox has
worked before on this Linux distro installation.
I was able to upgrade a copy of my main TW
Hi AllanBCohen
I was able to upgrade a copy of my main TW from 2.6.2 to 2.6.3 and
save it. However, when I tried to open it using my main version of
Firefox5, it gave me:
ReferenceError: wikifyPlain is not defined.
It sounds like you're having a Plugin problem...
Have you checked and
Hi Paulo
I am saddened to hear you say this.
Selfishly, perhaps, I wonder who will maintain your lovely MathSVGPlugin?
http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~psoares/MathSVG.html
Cheers
Andrew Mc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To view
I suspect this is due to this issue:
https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki/issues/38
I don't think we have quite worked out what has changed yet.
In the meantime the workaround is to use another browser to do the
upgrade.
Best wishes
Jon
On Aug 14, 10:08 pm, Paulo Soares
Under Linux I tried Firefox, Chromium, Opera and Rekonq and all of
them refused to update an empty TW. Should I try another OS also?
On a side note, I guess this finally answers a question that has been
bothering me for some time now: TW is dead! It has been a pleasant
ride but now it's over.
Thanks Jon. Worked just fine in IE8. Feels odd that something doesn't
work in FF, but does work in IE.
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
I haven't been able to upgrade any of my files. either. I only have
Linux and Android boxes, so an 'IE' fix is useless.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi Paulo
On a side note, I guess this finally answers a question that has been
bothering me for some time now: TW is dead! It has been a pleasant
ride but now it's over.
Would you please explain the background for this statement??
You haven't noticed or tried TiddlySpace, where most of the
Same here with firefox 5.
--
Paulo Soares
On 12 Ago, 18:46, Mark mak...@gmail.com wrote:
When running an update from backstage I get an error message Error
with the new core code. Any ideas?
Thanks
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki
When running an update from backstage I get an error message Error
with the new core code. Any ideas?
Thanks
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
30 matches
Mail list logo
