It was wysiwyg, ( or wysiye -edit) so no separate editor mode. The
issue with this approach - an approach I like by the way, is that if
text is special like a link (or macro) you have to have a way to get
to it. It had a ui mechanism ( a role over or right click - I can't
remember) which would
Ah, so it was TiddlyWiki-like, but not TiddlyWiki-based. All the code
I see is python, with just a few HTML files that may or may not have
js. So the code would not have been as portable as TW. Perhaps having
python as the engine made the business model problematic.
I don't suppose you know of a
Howdy TiddlyWikiers,
As a long time user of luminotes I was sad to see it go.
Luminotes is outstanding for brainstorming, brain-dumping kind of
work. Just click anywhere and type. boom.
No edit mode no CamelCase, no [[tags]], just a sharp tool for people
for people who need to put things down
How did it work? Create a TW on the fly? All the code I see is Python.
Mark
On Mar 2, 12:46 pm, twgrp matiasg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry to see Luminotes shut down[1]. As far as I know, it was a
commercialized TW version but because it was commercial it really had
focused on the
Just a side comment after looking at the
http://jackparke.googlepages.com/jtw.html#SQLQueryPlugin
mentioned by Wolfgang. It appears to be able to issue queries to an
existing database (of various kinds), but I would suspect that the
databases are unlikely to be portable in the same way as the
The include plugin:
http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/#IncludePlugin
lets you selectively bring in sets of tiddlers. You have to edit these
tiddlers in their source document, which is usually OK for archived
material.
Eric Shulman's ExternalTiddlersPlugin will bring in one tiddler at a
time
I noticed the similarities between Tiddlywiki and Luminotes too and
was also very pleased to see it was wysiwyg. Now I put it on a share
drive and to my disappointment realized that whatever I had added did
not show up when a colleague pulled it up.
On 18 août, 03:07, steved dipa...@gmail.com
My first impression is 'nice effort'. I think there are some ideas
useful for harvesting for future versions of TW. But I have an issue
with the implementation for my use.
My primary personal use of TW is on Linux (and a separate
implementation at work on WinXP, but these are not
Hi Alan,
Perhaps adding a visual parser
plugin for the EditTemplate would satisfy the same itch for TW for
those who would like to have WYSIWYG at all times.
http://www.tiddlytools.com/#PreviewPlugin
The database usage for storage is one of the more valuable ideas
presented here.
9 matches
Mail list logo
