In question of notability.
I can't accept the statement that TW is not a notable management
software. It's like mentioning that TW is not existing. Anything that
happened should exist and mentioned in Wikipedia.
On another wikipedia submission, I was flagged about a source camp
that did exist, ho
Maybe it's use in BT could be highlighted. I'm sure there must be some
references.
Perhaps we could all start adding to a references section at the end of the
article - or maybe in the comments page for now so that things can be kept
tidy?
We should also link back to the TW Google groups and t
A while ago -- if i remember right -- there were some researchers from a
French University looking for TiddlyWiki user stories. (Where they from
INSEAD?) . Does anyone know if they published anything, or are planning to?
In my experience, a academic refs please the Wikipedians.
Alex
On 20 Januar
I added a comment on the activity of development and this group:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWiki
which seems to have triggered the result "Keep" from an admin, and
removal of the banner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles
The reason for marking for deletion is here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWiki
The reason cited is : "Non notable management software. No reliable
sources provided, none found besides download links and promo
material."
I do not know what kind of sources wikipe
Anyone an active Wikipedia contributor.
I would jump in except the problems appears to be it is not high quality
post. Since I see no problem with it, it needs someone with experience
This is important for our profile.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
6 matches
Mail list logo
