*Mark... "The thing is, they wouldn't be lost."*Bingo!
Mark S. wrote:
>
> We're talking about small bookmarks. It doesn't have to be triple-vetted
> (it's all going to be vetted 2x -- once for the submission and 2nd when it
> gets merged). Mediocre ideas and sensational ideas might live hand-i
We're talking about small bookmarks. It doesn't have to be triple-vetted
(it's all going to be vetted 2x -- once for the submission and 2nd when it
gets merged). Mediocre ideas and sensational ideas might live hand-in-hand
in harmony. The thing is, they wouldn't be lost.
-- Mark
On Tuesday, Ma
Footnote.
One way to gather "candidate posts" would be to have a forwarding address.
Both GG online and email versions of this group support forwarding. That
seems a low-hassle approach?
Josiah
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
T
+1
I think that would be a good step. The issues arise in how to "metadata it"
& whether it should go through "peer approval." My sense is that its "yet
more work." I mean, WHO is gonna organise this?
One thing I thought about was posting links to such "special posts" to
Twitter. I've largely
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit
5 matches
Mail list logo
