Got it. How can I pass variable data to a Javascript macro, then?
Alan
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 3:53:02 AM UTC-5, Astrid Elocson wrote:
Hi Alan,
Macro parameters are *not* parsed as WikiText until they are returned to
a WikiText context. They're just inert strings of characters.
The $macrocall widget should do what you want. It is supposed to evaluate
inputs before passing them to a macro.
Alternately you can use set widgets and macros:
\define thisMacro()
javascriptmacro $(macroinput)$
\end
$set name=macroinput value=somevalue
thisMacro
/$set
This should
Hi Alan,
Macro parameters are *not* parsed as WikiText until they are returned to a
WikiText context. They're just inert strings of characters. This means your
JavaScript is receiving strings that start with *{{* and end with *}}*.
Only once the macro call has returned will its result be
Hi Tobias,
I'm finally getting back to this.
Here's a simple Javascript macro that displays the value of three
parameters and the results of a comparison to a constant:
/**
* Created by afinger on 2/24/2015.
*/
/*
Macro to build search string from section and company parameters
*/
I mean that the operator section{$:/temp/findby!!section} should only be
applied to the filter if the field value is not Any
I'll try to post an example in the next day or so.
Alan
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 2:43:44 AM UTC-5, Stephan Hradek wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015
Thanks, Jed,
That's a cool example
If you know what the filters will be you can use the select widget to set a
field to the entire filter string and use a text reference for the filters.
Added here: filter from field @ filters
http://filters.tiddlyspot.com/#filter%20from%20field.
Best
That works well for one variable. The problem is that I have two: section
and sourcedoc so I need to try to get concatenation working.
Alan
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 9:02:17 AM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote:
Thanks, Jed,
That's a cool example
If you know what the filters will be
Looks like a good place to use a javascript macro...
That may indeed be a viable way to achieve this...
*#1427 allow text-references and variables anywhere in a filter expression*
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1427
@Jeremy, (how) can a js macro acces a variable number of
Could you please post a fully (non-)working example? I have difficulties in
understanding what you're trying to do by just looking at an image. I'd
prefer to be able to play around a bit with real data and not try to make
up test data which I made up on my own and which need not match what you
Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015 08:42:13 UTC+1 schrieb Stephan Hradek:
Could you please post a fully (non-)working example? I have difficulties
in understanding what you're trying to do by just looking at an image. I'd
prefer to be able to play around a bit with real data and not try to make
Thanks for some good ideas! I may be missing it but is there a way to set
the value of a field programmatically? The action-setfield widget only
works inside a button.
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 11:26:43 PM UTC-5, Jed Carty wrote:
If you know what the filters will be you can use the
If you know what the filters will be you can use the select widget to set a
field to the entire filter string and use a text reference for the filters.
$select field='filter_field'
option value='[!is[tag]!is[system]]'Some name/option
option value='[!is[tag]!is[system]]'Another name/option
You (currently) need to use variables in filters like so...
[field-foovariable-bar]
not...
[field-foo[variable-bar]]
or...
[field-foovariable-bar]
For more on parameters and variables, see...
http://pv5.tiddlyspot.com
Best wishes, Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Tobias,
I don't think that's going to work for me as I want to conditionally
include entire filter operators in the filter. Depending the content of
some fields (Any means no filter), i want to get
[!is[tag]!is[system]]
[!is[tag]!is[system][field1[value1]]
14 matches
Mail list logo
