Brilliant pointer for sophisticated longer survival ...
Mark S... One (or more) of the extensions that you could get for Firefox
> was one to change the browser identification string presented to web sites.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
If you're sticking with an older browser, then you should probably be
downloading extensions left and right while you can still get them!
One (or more) of the extensions that you could get for Firefox was one to
change the browser identification string presented to web sites. Possibly
search
Ciao Birthe
I don't think so. Not shorter term. I don't think its an issue.
J.
Birthe C wrote:
>
> Will access to certain websites be restricted for browsers that does not?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from
Will access to certain websites be restricted for browsers that does not?
Birthe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
The issue with both Pale Moon & Waterfox is simple.
Will they, at some point, comply with their father's development ... i.e.
follow Firefox into its rejecting the direct file-save route, OR will they
truly break from it.
In six months this issue should begin to clarify.
FWIW, you have TIME
Hi Guys,
Many thanks for the encouragement!
I do keep all options open and check regularly here to see if there are
developments.
In practice I use at the moment Pale Moon, and especially TiddlyDesktop.
Just
recently I stumbled upon WaterFox, so I want to try out that solution.
Looking into
I agree with Mario it should be fine for a while, but I recommend exploring the
other options like TiddlyDesktop and TiddlyServer as more complete solutions or
the other saver options if you want to send others editable TWs.
It is always wise to look ahead a little.
Tony
--
You received this
On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 1:55:52 PM UTC+1, Ed wrote:
>
> I use a.o. Waterfox + TiddlyFox on my 64bit computer at work.
>
I didn't test Waterfox.
So I guess: As long as Waterfox isn't based on FF 57+ you should be good.
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
8 matches
Mail list logo
