[twdev] hypothetical Q on "TiddlySpace security discussion"

2010-07-31 Thread Mat
Referring to the discussion summary [1] and the statement that; "avoidance of running malicious or faulty code when including a space...[snip]...it must be possible to include a space in "content only mode", that is only including content and not including plugins (tiddlers tagged "systemConfig" ),

[twdev] hypothetical Q on "TiddlySpace security discussion"

2010-07-31 Thread Mat
Referring to the discussion summary [1] and the statement that; "avoidance of running malicious or faulty code when including a space...[snip]...it must be possible to include a space in "content only mode", that is only including content and not including plugins (tiddlers tagged "systemConfig" ),

Re: [twdev] Re: TiddlySpace System Space

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Downey
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:55 AM, PMario wrote: > Hi Paul, > I think, this is fighting the symptoms. In part, but making all of the system plugins available as tiddlers space has architectural benefits. > For me there is a need, that > the server handles plugin delivery. It is part of a security