[twdev] Re: Fields as First class citizens?

Mat, Hopefully this is not classed as a rant, some thoughts. I am inclined to keep the fieldname and value separate. Like in a standard database, a field is really just a column title, and the instances of it are the values associated with a key. Tiddlers are addressable by there unique name (

[twdev] Re: Thoughs on simplified syntax

See also a similar discussion on Fields https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/iw59ThjJID8 On Thursday, 10 August 2017 10:35:01 UTC+10, TonyM wrote: > > Can I please plead the members of this thread consider my post in the > other group that is related, although it may not be obvi

[twdev] [TWX] Deletable core modules

For TWX (...a future remake of TW) I hope it would be possible with a more delete-customizable standard distro, or even core plugin. For example, as I look on the tiddler tool buttons I realize that I just *never* use the "close others" button. And only very specific TWs of mine have any use fo

[twdev] Re: Fields as First class citizens?

On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 5:14:29 AM UTC-5, Mat wrote: > > I would also like for this (actually, I've even made this suggestion > myself, but I fail to find where). > > IMO tiddlers, as they're currently manifested, are not general enough to > be "the smallest semantically meaningful u

[twdev] Re: Fields as First class citizens?

I would also like for this (actually, I've even made this suggestion myself, but I fail to find where). IMO tiddlers, as they're currently manifested, are not general enough to be "the smallest semantically meaningful unit ". IMO, what is "the