[twdev] Re: Peer Review please Cheat sheet

FYI, the solution using join[] (or addsuffix[]) is *substantially* faster than using wikify to assign widget attributes. You: <$wikify name=style-value text="""color: {{!!color}}"""> style=<> Me: Check this in devtools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[twdev] Re: Node: Tiddler corrupted with full linux path

Are you running the latest code from Git or version 5.1.22 from npm? On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 9:10:46 PM UTC+1 phil...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > After uploading a bunch of Tiddlers to a local server in my home and > running TW, the TW on the server thinks some existing tiddlers

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 4)

Sorry Wrong link in my reply, part of my development. See https://www.unicode.org/Public/UCD/latest/ucd/BidiBrackets.txt for open and close pairs. Tony On Wednesday, 2 December 2020 at 16:26:45 UTC+11 TonyM wrote: > *TT, et al* > > Yes lets start "* Unicode and Font Support in TW* " thread,

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 4)

*TT, et al* Yes lets start "* Unicode and Font Support in TW* " thread, however I was keen to make it easier for us to finalise on our glyphs to support closing that issue., thus relevant to this thread. This may be a possibility to build our own targeted font, but its looking to me like most

[twdev] Re: Peer Review please Cheat sheet

CodaCoda, Yes I understand that, but I will review the cheat sheet to see if I give it sufficient weight. Did you look at the online version https://anthonymuscio.github.io/#Standard%20Nomenclature the filtered transclusions section could promote its use more. Tony On Wednesday, 2 December

[twdev] Re: Peer Review please Cheat sheet

Hi Tony Bold effort! I spotted something in there that I do quite often, but I do it a little differently: You: <$wikify name=style-value text="""color: {{!!color}}"""> style=<> Me: Check this in devtools Not sure which you might prefer... On Thursday, October 1, 2020 at 8:13:01

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 4)

On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 6:42:53 PM UTC+1 @TiddlyTweeter wrote: *...* It would be *a very minimal font embedded in TW for JUST markup > glyphs. It would be kilobytes, not megabytes*. To get to the point of > proof-of-concept I need some days yet, but I'm getting close. Its just > trudge

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 4)

Ciao TonyM & PMario TonyM wrote: > Here is my initial draft Glyphs 5.1.23-prerelease — Identifying reliable > Unicode Glyphs on TiddlyWiki Build Date (anthonymuscio.github.io) > > *TonyM*: That demo shows the issues arising over font

[twdev] Understanding how macro expansion works

Hi all, I haven't touched TW in quite some time. Yesterday I wanted to get back to a project I started 6 months ago, and was quickly stuck when using macros, realizing that my assumptions on how macro expansion works were wrong. I would expect macros to be expanded recursively, before any