Hello Diego,
I am totally agree with you! I think TW can use the experience form many
other successful software in this way. TW in 2019 is not the small code of
2004 and needs more people to be involved from different areas of
technology. Still I respect the Jeremy rights and wishes. He can
Diego Mesa,
Jeremy, I hope you can respond to this and I hope you don't mind me
speaking of you, I hope you set the record strait where I am in error.
Diego, I empathise with your position. I would however characterise
Jeremy's involvement from two perspectives
- one a high degree of sense
Hello TW Devs,
I have a delicate question/comment/discussion to pose to Jeremy and the
community.
As we know, the development priorities are set entirely by Jeremy, and (at
least most recently) new major features get developed by him as they become
relevant to Jeremy's use and development of
I've created an issue corresponding to this topic here:
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3591
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:14:03 AM UTC-6, Rob Hoelz wrote:
>
> Good idea, Jeremy! I was originally writing this up as a ticket on
> GitHub, but I figured it'd get more
Good idea, Jeremy! I was originally writing this up as a ticket on GitHub,
but I figured it'd get more exposure here. I'll open a ticket straight
away.
-Rob
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-6, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Rob
>
> Great, a proper overhaul of the popup
Hi Rob
Great, a proper overhaul of the popup mechanism is long overdue — the popup
mechanism was one of the first, and most demanding, interactive mechanisms to
be added to TW5 and I think we can now do a lot better.
Perhaps the details may be best discussed on a new GitHub ticket,
Best
Hi Rob, this is a much needed discussion, thanks for posting!
I think we should try something based on your ideas here, they all sound
reasonable to me
The action-popup widget is something I would love to see
The popup mechanism should also somehow allow access to the tiddler the
popup is
