See also a similar discussion on Fields
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/iw59ThjJID8
On Thursday, 10 August 2017 10:35:01 UTC+10, TonyM wrote:
>
> Can I please plead the members of this thread consider my post in the
> other group that is related, although it may not be obvi
Can I please plead the members of this thread consider my post in the other
group that is related, although it may not be obviouse at first.
[TW5] Desirable core additions
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/tiddlywiki/AduZlD79FZo
Regards
Tony
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 11:54:52 AM
Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> unify tiddlers and variables.
>
Whoaaa! That sounds conceptually huge!
> Pulling back up to your original question, the issue we'd now have is how
> to name those tiddlers that are acting as variables. Simple names like
> "currentTiddler” wouldn't be great because w
Hi Mat
Excellent, you're following a line of thought that has preoccupied me for a
long time.
Firstly, I think about this stuff in a cloud headed “what comes after
TiddlyWiki 5?” both because these sorts of changes are often challenging from a
backwards compatibility perspective, and more impo
Matt
Very useful thoughts for someone like me.
One thing missing, at least I can't find one, is a CRIB sheet of existing
syntax ... something along the lines of those that Tobias did for Filters
and WikiText examples.
My single biggest issue as an idiot is that I forget what all the variant
b
