On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:02:19PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:09:08 +0200
> Adam Tkac wrote:
>
> >
> > Hm, patch doesn't look fine for me.
> >
> > First, we should use same DPI in vfbScreenInit and vncRandRSetConfig
> > functions.
>
> It does since it first fetches the
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:09:08 +0200
Adam Tkac wrote:
>
> Hm, patch doesn't look fine for me.
>
> First, we should use same DPI in vfbScreenInit and vncRandRSetConfig
> functions.
It does since it first fetches the existing DPI. Duplicating the code
from vfbScreenInit just increases the risk of g
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> DPI is still a complete mess in X, and I don't see any point in trying
> to create a proper value as we don't have any knowledge of the physical
> screen in VNC. Instead we should try to retain the initial DPI at all
> times as that m
DPI is still a complete mess in X, and I don't see any point in trying
to create a proper value as we don't have any knowledge of the physical
screen in VNC. Instead we should try to retain the initial DPI at all
times as that makes things behave fairly consistent.
This should be in 1.0.
Index: x
