Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-24 Thread DRC
I believe it's time to begin waving the axe. I've tweaked out the CMake build system so that it's purring like a kitten on all of the platforms we're supporting, and the build documentation has been modified accordingly. I'm going to go ahead and start removing the legacy stuff. On 6/21/11 2:49

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-21 Thread DRC
> FLTK 1.3.0 is also out now, so we have a stable target for that > dependency (modulo the massive patch we have). Can you re-generate your patch against FLTK 1.3.0? I think we should remove the tarball from fltk/ and simply maintain a patch against the latest stable version. It will make the bu

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-21 Thread DRC
Yes, that's the end game of the build-xorg mods. On 6/21/11 2:46 AM, Tim Ooms wrote: > On 20/06/11 21:06, DRC wrote: >> Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) > > It may be an idea to start with providing a binary? (or did I miss it?) > ---

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-21 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:06:54 -0500 DRC wrote: > Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) > trunk is meant to be experimental at the moment, so we need anyone who's > using it to be experimental as well. Otherwise, we won't be hearing > about issues that people uncover

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-21 Thread Tim Ooms
On 20/06/11 21:06, DRC wrote: > Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) It may be an idea to start with providing a binary? (or did I miss it?) -- Tim -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's m

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-20 Thread DRC
Best way to get people to test it is to make it the only option. :) trunk is meant to be experimental at the moment, so we need anyone who's using it to be experimental as well. Otherwise, we won't be hearing about issues that people uncover. The prerequisite to that is me finishing up the build

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-20 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:06:40 -0500 DRC wrote: > > I am in the process of modifying build-xorg to build the new viewer. Then, I > will do some performance analysis on it to figure out where we stand in that > regard. > > AFAIC, we can remove the old viewer from trunk anytime you're ready, and

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-17 Thread DRC
I am in the process of modifying build-xorg to build the new viewer. Then, I will do some performance analysis on it to figure out where we stand in that regard. AFAIC, we can remove the old viewer from trunk anytime you're ready, and I think once I'm done with the build-xorg mods that we shou

[Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer "done"

2011-06-17 Thread Pierre Ossman
I've now reached a point where my near time todo list for vncviewer is empty. Except for Robert's issue, I have no known bugs at this time and the feature set should be good enough to replace the existing viewers. FLTK 1.3.0 is also out now, so we have a stable target for that dependency (modulo th

[Tigervnc-devel] New vncviewer

2011-03-09 Thread Pierre Ossman
The new vncviewer is now in trunk, so feel free to test. Note that there is no support for keyboard or mouse yet, so it is very much read only. It also has no fancy dialogs, so command line is the way to go. :) To build it, specify -DBUILD_NEW_VNCVIEWER=ON to cmake. I've tested it using i686, ming