Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-14 Thread Antoine Martin
On 11/04/2010 07:58 AM, DRC wrote: On 11/2/10 10:58 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: --disable-config-hal and --disable-config-udev configure options should fix those issues. Would you recommend that hal and udev be turned off for a default generic build? Or is it a harmless error? I don't really

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-09 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:37:34AM +0100, ti...@piments.com wrote: On 11/03/10 21:25, Antoine Martin wrote: On 11/04/2010 03:20 AM, ti...@piments.com wrote: On 11/03/10 19:17, ti...@piments.com wrote: (I did a clean pull a couple of days back but this issue seems to be happening the

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-04 Thread tiger
On 11/04/10 01:58, DRC wrote: On 11/2/10 10:58 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: --disable-config-hal and --disable-config-udev configure options should fix those issues. Would you recommend that hal and udev be turned off for a default generic build? Or is it a harmless error? I don't really see

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-03 Thread tiger
On 11/02/10 13:59, Adam Tkac wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:46:53PM +0200, ti...@piments.com wrote: On 10/30/10 03:05, ti...@piments.com wrote: Hi, I have been using tigervnc 1.0.0 since shortly after it came out, on kubuntu 9.04 x86-64and in general it has very reliable and performed

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-03 Thread tiger
On 11/03/10 21:25, Antoine Martin wrote: On 11/04/2010 03:20 AM, ti...@piments.com wrote: On 11/03/10 19:17, ti...@piments.com wrote: (I did a clean pull a couple of days back but this issue seems to be happening the same on 1.0.1 1.0.92 built from Antoine's tarball and two day old svn.

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-03 Thread DRC
On 11/2/10 10:58 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: --disable-config-hal and --disable-config-udev configure options should fix those issues. Would you recommend that hal and udev be turned off for a default generic build? Or is it a harmless error? I don't really see much point in having them for a

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] tigervnc taking out X

2010-11-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi Adam, Sat Oct 30 01:13:37 2010 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: undefined symbol: