Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Further evaluation of CMake

2010-10-27 Thread DRC
On 10/27/10 8:04 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: > I think you should take a look at the Scribus project and how it > supports CMake. From what I can tell at a quick glance, checking for > "various characteristics of Unix systems" is very straight forward: In > scribus-1.3.3.14/ConfigureChecks.cmake: > >

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Further evaluation of CMake

2010-10-27 Thread Peter Åstrand
Comments below: I've finished implementing a CMake build system for the libjpeg-turbo Windows code, and during the course of that project, I was able to gain a lot more experience with CMake in general. Based on what I've seen so far, it's my belief that porting the existing TigerVNC Unix buil

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Further evaluation of CMake

2010-10-15 Thread Adam Tkac
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:26:33AM -0500, DRC wrote: > What I'm going to recommend, for now, is that I go ahead and finish > implementing and stabilizing the CMake system for building the Windows > code and that we use both systems side-by-side in TigerVNC 1.1. We > could drop Windows support from