I've mentioned the performance issue before. Not sure what exactly is going on,
but the TigerVNC native viewer on Mac is on the order of 10x slower than it
should be. It has to be an FLTK issue.
On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Robert Goley wrote:
> I haven't test 10.8 yet but it is working on 10.
I haven't test 10.8 yet but it is working on 10.6. It is surprisingly
slower at screen refreshing than the Java viewer. I will continue using
the java viewer on this machine. I will report on 10.8 later.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brian Hinz wrote:
> The OS-X pre-release build has been u
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Brian Hinz wrote:
> On a side note, per Peter's bug report (http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2917)
> FLTK 1.3.2 doesn't build for 10.5. I tried applying the diff of 9798:9799
> to the 1.3.2 source but the resulting code doesn't compile either so I just
> went with the
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:37 AM, DRC wrote:
> On 6/10/13 4:18 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > I tested on the 10.8 and 10.4 machines we have here for testing
> > ThinLinc, and the results were:
> >
> > 10.8: Works fine (AFAICT)
> >
> > 10.4: Boom:
> >
> > lab-21:~/Desktop aaron$ ./TigerVNC\ View
On 6/10/13 4:18 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> I tested on the 10.8 and 10.4 machines we have here for testing
> ThinLinc, and the results were:
>
> 10.8: Works fine (AFAICT)
>
> 10.4: Boom:
>
> lab-21:~/Desktop aaron$ ./TigerVNC\ Viewer\
> 1.2.90.app/Contents/MacOS/TigerVNC\ Viewer
> dyld: Symbo
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 14:37:56 -0400
Brian Hinz wrote:
> The OS-X pre-release build has been updated to fix backwards compatibility
> issues. I've verified that this new build works on OS-X 10.6 Snow Leopard
> Server and 10.7 Lion. It should work on 10.5 and 10.8 as well but I can't
> verify eithe
