Bug Tracker item #3605165, was opened at 2013-02-18 00:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ejs1920
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3605165&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:24:13AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> We've done a whole lot of changes since 1.2.0, so I'm starting to feel
> like it could be time to do another release of TigerVNC. One issue I'd
> like to revisit for that release is that of an upgrade to GPLv3.
>
> Last time we had t
My understanding is that if the current code is under a GPL2+
license, that is not required. If it is under a GPL2 only license,
then all contributors must agree to the change. The Linux kernel is
an example of the latter.
Robert
On 02/18/2013 06:35
My understanding agrees with Robert's, because the license says "you can
redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General
Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." If
any code used pu
