On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:24:13AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > We've done a whole lot of changes since 1.2.0, so I'm starting to feel > like it could be time to do another release of TigerVNC. One issue I'd > like to revisit for that release is that of an upgrade to GPLv3. > > Last time we had this discussion, Cendio was for it and so was Adam. > DRC was opposed to it though. Since then DRC has moved away from > TigerVNC, and we've gotten Brian Hinz as a major contributor of Java > code. So what are the opinions of the current development group? Cendio > is still very much for a change.
Personally I have no problem with GPLv2 -> GPLv3 change. However if I understand licensing correctly, everyone who contributed to TigerVNC in past must agree with the change, which includes also Constantin Kaplinsky and his TightVNC crew and probably also RealVNC and their crew. But as I wrote above, I'm not 100% sure about this. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
