Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [PATCH] Fix latency issue

2011-11-11 Thread Pierre Ossman
I've now received official allocations for the extensions introduced here. Unless I hear any big objections, I intend to start committing this next week. Updated patch attached. -- Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Reenabling the comparing update tracker (CUT)

2011-11-11 Thread Brian Hinz
Initially I would have agreed completely with DRC since 95% of my users are on GbE fiber, but if those numbers accurately reflect typical usage (and it would seem they do) then I have to wonder how this might affect throughput. It's been a while since the last time I tried to quantify this (6

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Reenabling the comparing update tracker (CUT)

2011-11-11 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:54:21 -0500 Brian Hinz bph...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Initially I would have agreed completely with DRC since 95% of my users are on GbE fiber, but if those numbers accurately reflect typical usage (and it would seem they do) then I have to wonder how this might

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Reenabling the comparing update tracker (CUT)

2011-11-11 Thread DRC
I have hundreds of users using TurboVNC (which doesn't have a CUT) with dual 1920x1200 displays, and CPU is definitely the primary limitation. They are not having issues with bandwidth. What I'm saying is that we should not have a knee-jerk reaction to this or to decide based on only one or