In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rex writes:
I often looked at who I was
bidding against. There was lots of info to be gleaned if you looked.
What items were the last few items they purchased or sold? Are they
paying reasonable amounts. Do they sell much? Is there a pattern or all
over the place?
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:02:58 +, Poul-Henning Kamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rex writes:
I often looked at who I was
bidding against. There was lots of info to be gleaned if you looked.
What items were the last few items they purchased or sold? Are they
paying
Hi!
With the launch of SVN58/PRN12 the GPS constellation raised to 31 sats, SVN58
was introduced into the constellation at 13 Dec.
Have anyone seen any receiver malfunction since?
I am aware of a solar storm on the 15 Dec, but given the data from IGS the
ionspheric activity have been fairly
Hi Magnus:
Starting 10 Jan 21:18 local Pacific time my plot of GPS vs. FTS4060 has
improved a lot. Why I don't know.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com
Magnus Danielson wrote:
Hi!
Jason,
What divider output are you using? The typical input to the phase detector
should be between 312.5KHz and 625KHz and an appropriate jumper has to be
installed on the divider header on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] board to tie the
selected divider
output to the phase detector. Sounds like you
From: Brooke Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS trouble anyone?
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:27:26 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Magnus:
Hi Brooke!
Starting 10 Jan 21:18 local Pacific time my plot of GPS vs. FTS4060 has
improved a lot. Why I don't know.
Um. How
Hi Poul,
I think your point of view is correct.
I manufacture Fibre based GE + TDM Telecommunications products sold to the
European and Asia market with exceptional reliability to operate within the
Power industry. They demand 99.999% availability end to end and devices with
time
Dear Time-nuts,
Just a quick experiment. I started with the cold 10811 OCXO (switched
off for 24 hours). I connected it to a counter and noted the frequency
every 30 seconds. (last two measurement each 5 minutes).
You can see the curve in the attached PDF. The offset at t=0 was 1706 Hz
Magnus Danielson wrote:
Hi!
With the launch of SVN58/PRN12 the GPS constellation raised to 31 sats, SVN58
was introduced into the constellation at 13 Dec.
Have anyone seen any receiver malfunction since?
I am aware of a solar storm on the 15 Dec, but given the data from IGS the
ionspheric
I know at least one of the listmembers owns a functional Odetics 325,
but I don't recall who it is.
Would those who have functioning units, as well as the inclination to
do some test-point probing, please get in touch with me? I would need you to do
some simple tests involving
Hi Bruce,
I have 3 SatSync's, I'll contact you off list. If other list members
want the noise let me know and I'll copy to the list.
Robert G8RPI.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Lane
Sent: 16 January 2007 14:35
To:
Yeah, pretty soon eBay will probably anonymize the whole thing. You won't
know who you are buying it from, just a rating... And thanks to the recent
changes you don't know who is bidding... We are all doomed!
Jason
I think I liked the old system better. I often looked at who I was
bidding
What receiver are you having a failure in?
My Oncore UT+ VP work fine, so do my Jupiter 8's Those are the oldest
receivers I have online at the moment here.
Oh, I recently had some Trimble ACE III receivers doing testing with those,
and they worked fine too.
Jason
Um. How nice for you.
Looking for the following items for an Odetics CommSync:-
. AC to DC power supply: Odetics stock number 0350148 (2 required)
. Power Supply Adapter cable: Odetics stock number 0420098 (2
required)
Have just acquired a CommSync, but need the external AC-DC power supplies
and cables
That is interesting. I have not checked the 10811 for that particular behavior,
but I have checked a number of cheap, non TC crystal oscillators, and the
initial drift has always been much smaller, in the order of 100's of Hz, not
1,000's, scaled for 10 MHz.
I refer to the crystal oscillators
I seem to be seeing an increasing number of postings that are being
rejected because the attachments are too big.
The list is set to accept non-threatening (ie, no .exe, etc. files)
attachments up to 128kb in size.
I really need to enforce that limit because now that we have about 400
Hi John,
I think that last one was my fault. It was not supposed to go to
time-nuts sorry.
Had, K7MLR
At 10:19 AM 1/16/2007, you wrote:
I seem to be seeing an increasing number of postings that are being
rejected because the attachments are too big.
A well regulated Militia, being
No problem, Had. Actually, there have been two or three in the last
couple of days, so you're not alone.
John
Had wrote:
Hi John,
I think that last one was my fault. It was not supposed to go to
time-nuts sorry.
Had, K7MLR
At 10:19 AM 1/16/2007, you wrote:
I seem to be
Didier Juges wrote:
It may be due to the fact that the crystal in the HP 10811 is optimized
for flat temperature sensitivity around the operating point of the oven,
when the cheap crystals I have checked are optimized around ambient (if
they are optimized at all).
For many years, 10811
The seller can see all the bidder information as usual; it's only other
users who are denied the information. There is some good in it, to be sure:
you can buy (expensive) gifts without tipping your hand, and you no longer
have to feel guilty about bidding against your friends!
The trouble is,
As can be seen in the seller's pictures, those oscillators did not have HP's
final model/serial number label. As such they would never have left the
Santa Clara factory through normal marketing channels. Instead they were
likely purchased at a HP (or Agilent) employee scrap auction or part of a
Greg Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As can be seen in the seller's pictures, those oscillators did not have HP's
final model/serial number label. As such they would never have left the
Santa Clara factory through normal marketing channels. Instead they were
likely purchased at a HP (or
Here's one for you guys...
What would the cause be when you power one up, and it seems to try to
oscillate, but then powers down (current consumption drops way down)?
Thermal fuse again or just toast?
Jason
I'll apolgize on behalf of HP for putting in that stupid thermal
fuse. It cannot be
Powers down after how long? The oven current should drop dramatically in a
few minutes. Does it quit oscillating?
Doesn't sound like the thermal fuse, if it stops oscillating altogether.
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
The oscillator and oven run on separate power supplies.
Your posting is ambiguous. I don't know whether you
are talking about the oscillator or the oven.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rabel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL
Yeah I just realized after reading my post it was kind of missing a few key
details.
It was actually an one of those 10811-60155's from the initial big batch on
eBay that I sent back (never tested) because one of the standoffs was bent
so it wouldn't mount properly. I didn't want to try
That'll be great, Bob, thanks.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 16-Jan-07 at 15:33 Robert Atkinson wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have 3 SatSync's, I'll contact you off list. If other list members
want the noise let me know and I'll copy to the list.
Robert G8RPI.
-Original
That can be bent back into position... just take a pair of pliers to it.
Won't hurt a thing. Take the screws off and remove the cover first if you
like. It won't explode on your workbench!
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
At 9:06 PM -0500 1/15/07, Chuck Harris wrote:
Michael Sokolov wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks to everyone who has replied to my query!
I have a few additional questions though:
1. What about the tin whiskers? Will they be eliminated by using SnPb
solder, or will they always remain a
29 matches
Mail list logo
