Hi
I think in this case we're talking more about phase coherent situations than
about simple interaction.
Bob
On May 13, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>> With physical oscillators coupling is limited by the speed of sound (in the
>> medium, with pendulum clocks wood is lots quicker th
> With physical oscillators coupling is limited by the speed of sound (in the
> medium, with pendulum clocks wood is lots quicker than air with 3-4 km/s)
> with electronic oscillators the speed of light. Latter means that their
> distance has to be short enough so that they lie within each other's
On 05/13/2010 01:22 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
and allow for meshes in your synchronization to combat path issues.
The SSM based synchronisation routing is not state of the art, but a
fairly well understood and documented thing. The ITU-T G.781 is
available for free download. The ETSI docum
Like other environmental effects this external impulse would have to have a
precise period to move a set of non-synced clocks toward sync otherwise it is
just noise. If the impulse is strong then it becomes the clock, or if it is
precise again it is the clock, otherwise it is noise the clock mak
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:22:03AM -0400, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> If gravity effects are the coupling mechanism, then even pendulums are "speed
> of light" coupled.
February 1665 Huygens discovered the effect with pendulums locked
in 50 kg wooden boxes coupling over a wooden beam (he was sick,
Hi
and allow for meshes in your synchronization to combat path issues.
Bob
On May 13, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> On 05/12/2010 08:47 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone utilized a network of locally, weakly coupled
>> oscillator synchronization (a la
>> http://www.p
Hi
If gravity effects are the coupling mechanism, then even pendulums are "speed
of light" coupled.
Bob
On May 13, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Alan Melia wrote:
>> Nice reference thanks for those Stanley...interesting, thought provoking
>>
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Alan Melia wrote:
> Nice reference thanks for those Stanley...interesting, thought provoking
> reading! Moving apart and possibly changining the relative positions of the
> plane of the swing too to test the coupling. There are ways of measuring
> this if
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:14:50PM -0400, Bob Camp wrote:
> If the oscillators all lock to each other, then multiple oscillators don't
> have any particular advantage.
They're not strongly coupled, they're weakly coupled. There's no
master-slave relationship, but a slow synchronization to a
res
Nice reference thanks for those Stanley...interesting, thought provoking
reading! Moving apart and possibly changining the relative positions of the
plane of the swing too to test the coupling. There are ways of measuring
this if you have the time :-)) My thought was that even an uncoupled set
mig
On 05/12/2010 08:47 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Has anyone utilized a network of locally, weakly coupled
oscillator synchronization (a la
http://www.projectcomputing.com/resources/sync/index.html )
for precise timekeeping purposes?
You have to realize that if you have N clocks interlocked, then t
Dear all
A potted history. Before I start a warning I suffer from dyslexia and
twitter like a buddie, not a god combination. The aim of the effort in
writting this is to forge a way forward to get young people involved with
the concept of time and the recording of it. Hence www.timemachinefun.
12 matches
Mail list logo
