As discussed earlier there is a bug in the firmware of these devices where they
report the wrong date of a leapsecond if it is announced more than three months
in advance. Mine were reporting leapseconds will occur on 30 Sep 2016.
Well, the event passed and the devices reset their
going to the emergency place
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On 10/1/2016 6:54 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
OK, I give up. My participation in this thread is over.
Bob
-
Why?
You asked some questions and several people have tried to help you. I think one
issue is that you mention measuring
Hi
DMTD = dual mixer time difference, a system publicized in a paper by NIST in
the late 1970’s. You mix two “same frequency” DUT’s with an offset oscillator.
The beat notes out of the mixers are measured (often with a “computing counter)
to get high resolution measurements. Basically an
OK, I give up. My participation in this thread is over.
Bob
-
AE6RV.com
GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info
From: Wes
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:33
On 10/1/2016 5:13 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
Hi Bob Albert,
Completely eliminate the use of the term "DMTD". I didn't post that.
Actually you did in your first post.
"I've been spending a small amount of my time looking into making a sort of
hybrid DMTD with a pair of DBMs"
AllStar DGPS base station. Uses a 10 MHz internal reference. I have
lots of docs that I downloaded some time ago. Make me an offer.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jc4t1959l3bpf2v/Starbox.jpg?dl=01
Joe Gray
W5JG
___
time-nuts mailing list --
You are firing those acronyms at me too quickly. I don't know what most of
them signify.
If you have two oscillators, I assume that somehow you lock them to the same
frequency; otherwise the phase difference will be changing. Which one is the
reference, and why?
If you want to measure phase
Hi
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 8:13 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
>
> Hi Bob Albert,
>
> I'm having trouble following it, as well, and I started it. So, let's back
> up. Completely eliminate the use of the term "DMTD". I didn't post that.
(see way below for why we are confused)
>
Hi Bob Albert,
I'm having trouble following it, as well, and I started it. So, let's back up.
Completely eliminate the use of the term "DMTD". I didn't post that. I'm
only interested in measuring phase with the 3456A, which is a voltmeter.
So, I have two disciplined OCXOs, a DBM, an LPF,
Hi
If you have two inputs into the mixer, one comes from one OCXO and the other
comes from another OCXO.
If you set the EFC voltage on one or the other OCXO so the output of the mixer
is zero, the inputs are 90 degrees apart. At that point the mixer has a maximum
phase sensitivity and the
I am having trouble following this thread. I assume we are trying to measure
phase noise, but of course the result includes the noise of the local
oscillator(s). Isn't the 3456A a voltmeter? I have one of those. In AC mode
it has a bandwidth of more than 100 kHz and measures true rms.
Hi Bob,Can you tell me what you mean by "just put the two inputs in quadrature,
attach to a sound card and you have all you need for phase noise."? What
inputs do you assume I have? I don't think I can attach two 10MHz inputs to a
soundcard and expect anything useful.
Bob
From: Bob
I think you have mistaken the tilde symbol as a negative sign. Tim's 11 dBm
is into the pad.
7 dBm +- 2 dB into 50 ohms is the spec for the mv89 no?
On Saturday, 1 October 2016, Bob Camp wrote:
> HI
>
> > On Oct 1, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Scott Stobbe
HI
DMTD = Dual Mixer Time Difference
Single Mixer = what is commonly used for most things.
If you have a single mixer setup, just put the two inputs in quadrature, attach
to a sound card and you have all you need for phase noise.
Bob
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Bob Stewart
Hi Bob,
I don't have a DMTD breadboarded up for testing. This was just a test of the
new LPF using only a single Mini Circuits ZLW-1H DBM, and things kind of
progressed from looking at the output of the LPF on the scope to "I wonder what
I would see on the 3456A?" sort of thing. I'm running a
HI
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Scott Stobbe wrote:
>
> If you used a 6db pad in conjunction with a 50 ohm termination you are spot
> on. If you used a 6dB pad as a 50 ohm load, the effective load will be a
> bit higher than 50 and the attenuation less than 6 dB.
Hi
What is the beat note coming out of the DMTD?
Put another way:
DMTD involves three oscillators. Two are on roughly the same frequency and the
third is
offset from the other two. The difference frequency is typically something like
10 Hz.
It does not *have* to be 10 Hz, but that is one
If you used a 6db pad in conjunction with a 50 ohm termination you are spot
on. If you used a 6dB pad as a 50 ohm load, the effective load will be a
bit higher than 50 and the attenuation less than 6 dB. Either way sounds
like the output stage of your OCXO is in spec for 7 dBm into 50 ohms.
On
Bob,
Just try it. Compare it and see how the initial noise slope behaves and
compare it to other measurements.
Similar phase-measurement setups have been used in historic context.
What ends up being the best method for you is a combination of what
tools you have available and dare to bring
I've been spending a small amount of my time looking into making a sort of
hybrid DMTD with a pair of DBMs up front feeding the stereo input to a sound
card. So, I got the 100KHz LPF back from Oshpark and hooked it up to my scope
for verification - an obvious step. Then I hooked it up to my
21 matches
Mail list logo