I have a quad LT3042 board somewhere.
I should get around to measuring its output noise.
Bruce
> On 20 March 2018 at 03:11 John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, all. I think I'll end up using the 3042 with pass transistor,
> partly for reasons of cost. I have no idea
The details are on the LT3042 datasheet.
A small series ballast resistor is used in series with each output and the Iref
terminals are connected in parallel so only the offset of the unity gain output
buffer is of significance.
Bruce
>
> On 20 March 2018 at 02:23 Peter Vince
John -
I would NOT bother with trying to replace the 10 MHz oscillator.
Spend your $$ for the inexpensive Arduino board, LCD, 5 volt antenna, and nice
enclosure that will provide you with a “self-running” GPSDO unit (operator
intervention not required to operate).
The fact that Mt. Airy
True Position was a Berwyn, PA mobile industry equipment provider.
In 2014 they acquired Skyhook Wireless and changed company name to acquirer’s.
—
These True-Position units are surplus from the cellular/mobile phone industry.
Several years ago, when these units first appeared (2010/2011), the Mt.
Thank you for sharing your experience, Bill. I thought about building a
wooden case and still might. My concern with the metal rack cabinet is that
the metal panels can act as drumheads. In my 113, the 1KHz "singing" is
much reduced once the motor is started. Whether it's drowned out by the
motor
Many thanks to everyone who provided suggestions regarding time-and-tech
(and other) things to see in Switzerland!
I am working through the suggestions. My wife (and mostly) I hope to pack
in as many of them as possible.
I also look forward to meeting any of you who plan to attend the
Thanks, all. I think I'll end up using the 3042 with pass transistor,
partly for reasons of cost. I have no idea whether paralleling two
3042s would result in lower noise from the device, and there are already
three or four fairly pricey chips on the board.
I appreciate all the info!
John
Please forgive this naive question, but I am concerned about the idea of
simply running two regulators in parallel. Just like you don't put two
batteries in parallel, how do you ensure accurate load balancing between
the two? I would worry that one of them, with a fractionally higher
voltage,
Here's another experience with a 103 crystal standard with the requisite
100 KC output and a 113 clock. I craved the clock because I'd seen it in
the Smithsonian precision time exhibit.
The 103 was certainly quiet, but the 113 was not, in spite of its heavy
cast aluminum case. The 1 KC stepping