Well, how about the frequency drift between a pendulum, a tuning fork,
and a crystal.
Atomic standards could be added depending on availability.
Bill Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Hal
Murray
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 11:56
Um, time dilation by altitude if you have access to a mile high change.
Or subjective time dilation when a person is prevented from doing a task
on time.
Bill Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Hal
Murray
Sent: Thursday, May 10,
A few months ago, I was a judge for the county level middle school science
fair. (I'm not very good at what they wanted, but that's a different
problem.)
What sort of interesting time related experiments can a middle school geek do?
Borrowing serious gear may not be off scale as long as a
>
>
> Results from the Z12 in L1/L2 mode were... iffy... then the receiver died.
>
The teqc tool from UNAVCO can help with diagnosing iffy data. Can you put
your RINEX somewhere? With the antenna in an unobstructed area my Z12
routinely gives 1 cm-ish horizonal, few-cm 3D, using OPUS-S or
> Well, my Z12 stopped tracking sats yesterday. It passes all self-tests.
> I then replaced the memory backup batteries... it fixed the bootup error
> problem, but still won't track sats.
>
Rats. Is the antenna known to be good? Is the Z12 providing bias on the
antenna cable? Did the Z12
I have Lady Heather's RINEX writer working fairly well. Handles GPS and
GLONASS (should also do Galileo when the M8T comes in from Germany... was "in
stock" but it took them over a week to ship it).
I just did a run on the Furuno GT-8736. It only outputs pseudoranges. A 2.5
hour run @ 1Hz
Well, my Z12 stopped tracking sats yesterday. It passes all self-tests. I
then replaced the memory backup batteries... it fixed the bootup error problem,
but still won't track sats.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe,
Hi
> On May 10, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Oleg Skydan wrote:
>
> Bob, thanks for clarification!
>
> From: "Bob kb8tq"
>> If you collect data over the entire second and average that down for a
>> single point, then no, your ADEV will not be correct.
>
> That
Bob, thanks for clarification!
From: "Bob kb8tq"
If you collect data over the entire second and average that down for a
single point, then no, your ADEV will not be correct.
That probably explains why I got so nice (and suspicious) plots :)
There are a number of papers on
Hi
More or less:
ADEV takes the *difference* between phase samples and then does a standard
deviation on them. RMS of the phase samples makes a lot of sense and it was
used back in the late 50’s / early 60’s. The gotcha turns out to be that it is
an
ill behaved measure. The more data you
I'm a bit fuzzy, then, on the definition of ADEV. I was under the
impression that one measured a series of
"phase samples" at the desired spacing, then took the RMS value of that
series, not just a single sample,
as the ADEV value.
Can anybody say which it is? The RMS approach seems to make
Paul,
I agree with Bob, the small telecom ones to include the Efratom ones have
a lifetime that is just a guess at this point.
A brand new PRS10 with a warranty and the original owner repair discount
would be a good bet, they do however have lamp assy problems unless that
has been redesigned.
Hi
If you collect data over the entire second and average that down for a single
point, then no, your ADEV will not be correct.
There are a number of papers on this. What ADEV wants to see is a single phase
“sample” at one second spacing. This is
also at the root of how you get 10 second ADEV.
Hi Magnus...
Appreciate any help!
I participate in the ARRL Frequency Measuring Test,
and I would like to automate the measuring process.
I have two frequencies, A and B...
A is a GPS locked HP 3336B set to 455,000.000 Hz
I use the 3336B instead of the 455,000Hz BFO
signal from my GPS
Hi
I have got a pair of not so bad OCXOs (Morion GK85). I did some
measurements, the results may be interested to others (sorry if not), so I
decided to post them.
I ran a set of 5minutes long counter runs (two OCXOs were measured against
each other), each point is 1sec gate frequency
Hi,
What issues do you have?
Cheers,
Magnus
On 05/08/2018 02:32 AM, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
> Hello Time Nuts...
>
>
>
> Who is the resident expert on the HP5372A?
>
> I have some operational questions. ;-)
>
> email off list please. w4wj at aol.com
>
> TNX all...
>
> 73
>
16 matches
Mail list logo