Warren,
Perhaps I am being too hard on the Tbolt. If I never had a Z3801, I am sure
I would like the Tbolt a lot more. The Z3801 seems to just sit there and
work without having to assure either its voltage or temperature or anything
else for that matter. I do believe the things I am seeing are comi
Warren, Thanks for the Tbolt tips. The power supply was a good linear supply
so I doubt that was causing what I see. The room temp was cycling a degree,
maybe two, I did sometime see some quick shifts that were not coincident
with temperature but they were all less than 10 nS. The largest swings
al
I have been following the discussion regarding Tbolt performance closely. I
have 2 of them and have not seen performance even close to what others
report. I don't seem to have sensitivity related issues that others have
reported. I am feeding Tbolt and Z3801 from a common antenna through a
purpose
The discussion on the merits of failure rate calculations is fascinating. I
was asked by one of our customers to provide MTBF for our products. After
some research, I told them I couldn't provide that data and didn't think it
would be of much use if I did. I asked if MTTF wouldn't be a better figur
Do you need 80 MHz exactly? I have a number of tcxos around that frequency
but I doubt any that are exactly 80 MHz. By the way, $12 for a good crystal
doesn't sound all that high. Seems the last ones I bought from ICM for
channel elements which aren't all that precise, were close to $20.
__
All the discussion regarding jamming GPS has been very interesting. Because
it is spread spectrum, I always assumed it would be difficult to jam GPS.
The Monterey Bay incident indicates that it is extremely easy to jam GPS.
So, as soon as another project is out of the way, I intend to do some
exper
I have one that I bought at least 25 years ago. Never been turned on. I
believe it was brand new. It had the HP spec sheet with it. I keep saying I
am going to power it up and see what it does. Now that I have some equipment
that can actually do that, I'll give it a try. Maybe sooner than another 2
I did find this: http://www.realhamradio.com/GPS_Trimble_Receiver.htm
Looks kind of like a Tbolt in a fancy case. Article says it doesn't work
with Satstat. I'll bet it does work with Tboltmon.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscri
There is what appears to be a Trimble copy of a Z3801 on eBay. number
370234484785.
I can't seem to find any info. Is this really a Z3801 copy or just a Tbolt
in a fancy case?
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://
Just so you know, Colicraft makes them too.
http://www.coilcraft.com/bcl-s.cfm#table
Probably quite a bit cheaper than Piconics and they are available either
with flying leads or surface mount. I don't believe they use any core
material but the specifications look like they would be suitable for a
Mark Sims wrote:
A lot depends upon the temperature sensor in the Tbolt. ? ?Dallas Semi
changed the guts of the sensor ship in such a way that the Tbolt can only
get 1 degree resolution out of it. ? Later production Tbolts all have that
sensor. ?Does your Tbolt show a mostly flat line temp curve wi
I think I might have found at least part of the answer. Extreme sensitivity
to ambient temperature. I held a heat gun a couple of feet away and in under
a minute, it went nuts. I don't think I was heating the OCXO that much. I
believe it was the internal temperature sensor. I didn't get it that hot
Tbolts seem to have a very good reputation for accuracy and stability. Most
comments I have seen compare them favorably to the HP/Symmetricom Z3801.
Mine may be OK in the very long term but doesn't look too good in the short
term. Let me explain. First, I'll describe my set up. I have a Z3801 which
My MV89 runs 56 C on the outside of its case in a room with a 27 C ambient.
I can touch it but can't leave my fingers there long. I realize that OCXOs
are supposed to be warm but this is way hotter than anything else I have.
The current draw seems OK, less than 300 mA after warm up. Is this normal?
Poul Henning wrote:
You should pick your poison carefully here:
Low noise regulators are usually not very stable, typically they
are quite sensitive to temperature.
Precision regulators are stable, but tend to be noisy.
If your OCXO is voltage sensitive, make sure to connect the sense
resistor t
Thanks Poul,I had not considered that one probably because of the package.
It does look like a contender. I am considering the LT3080 because of the
tight regulation and it is available in not one, but 2 power packages. The
tab is tied to the output though. The max current is around 300 mA cold an
I have a project where I need to supply a nice, steady 12 volts to an OCXO.
>From the spec sheet, the LT3080 looks much better than the venerable 7812.
However, when I started to look at the application data closely, my
enthusiasm waned a bit. It seems the voltage set pin is so sensitive to
outside
Interesting comments regarding. lead free solder. I was not aware of the tin
whisker problem. We went lead free here at work several years ago. I really
don't like the lead free solder we have to use on several accounts. As
mentioned, you don't get nice shiny joints. They look pretty much like cold
Murray wrote:I have an MV89, and it draws about 320mA steady state. No
cycling of the
current at all once warmed up. The surface temperature is warm, but you
can leave your hand on it.
Performance wise, the MV89 is very good. The ageing is particularly low
- after only a week from power-up it's ru
I looked up the specifications to be sure, they state a steady state current
of less than 350 mA after warm up. Also, after about 10 minutes, it is too
hot to touch. Definitely bad. I am going to contact the seller.Thanks
___
time-nuts mailing list -- tim
I got one of them from one of those Chinese eBay sources. Hooked it up, let
it warm up,it does get rather warm to the touch. Problem is that I can't get
it on 10 MHz. Even if I connect the control voltage input directly to the
reference voltage out, it is still low by about 4 Hz. Another thing, the
You see, We had a quart can of Alcohol and a quart can of Acetone from
Home Depot. In retrospect I should have called in "60 Minutes" to show
them up for the fools they were.
FWIW,
-John
We routinely keep 50 gallon drums of both and have never had a minutes
trouble from anyone.
__
The more I kept looking at the data I was getting with regard to comparing
the Z3801 to the Tbolt, the less sense it made. Finally, I concluded that I
made some kind of fundamental error either in how I was measuring or there
was a problem with what I was measuring with. The only thing I am sure of
Yesterday, I thought the Tbolt was wandering around too much. So, I did a
factory reset and started a new 5K
fix self survey. At about the same time, I started a new self survey on the
Z3801 thinking that if they were
both looking at the same satellites with the same antenna at the same time,
they
I realize that making measurements over a day or two says very little about
long term aging. Most of my crystal oscillator experience has been with
TCXOs in the communications industry. We are talking about orders of
magnitude difference with regard to just about everything. In my experience,
a goo
I had always thought that crystals changed frequency consistently in one
direction as they age. That is until recently. I was trying to get the
reference in my 1992 as close as possible to my Z3801 and noticed that as I
adjusted the fine pot, there didn't seem to be a place where the frequency
stay
Harry Hindriks wrote:
You can switch the mode to standard language instead of MATE/CIIL by
changing a jumper inside the counter.
There is an option jumper on the GPIB board labeled "SK4". I moved the
suitcase jumper from the lower position to the upper. Here's hoping that is
the correct one. It wa
Antonio wrote:At power on, I read 1992 first, then 8572 0404
Mine does the same.
I will have to try that jumper. GPIB is bad enough. I have no interest in
learning some obscure military format. My manual has info on the MATE
format. I believe the online version has all the GPIB commands. I hope to
Ed,Mine comes out of standby pretty much where it is going to be. I see from
information posted that I seem to have option 4E. Mine doesn't look quite
that good compared to GPS. I believe mine is an 02M model though there is
nothing on the unit to say so. The manual says the GPIB should be a 401820
Ed Palmer wrote:Which timebase does yours have? I've got option 4E (similar
to 4B).
Although the timebase appears to be stable, I've noticed that the
counter drifts about 5e-9 during warmup, even when the oscillator has
been on standby for many days. It takes a couple of hours to settle
down. Do
Just acquired a used 1992 off eBay. Excellent, almost like new with manual
and even spare fuses. I noticed that the internal reference's waveform is
more like a nasty sawtooth than a nice sine wave. Is that normal? Also, when
I hook my GPSDO through a two way splitter and two different length cable
I had been eyeing the Softmark unit. Thanks for the heads up. I think I'll
go with the prologix though it will have to wait. It is a little outside of
the budget at the moment. We have a piece of Agilent test equipment that can
act as a bus controller. I might dig out the book and play with that so
I can't afford LabView, so what are my options? Is there a preferable USB to
GPIB converter? I am looking for a way to take readings and put them into a
file for further processing.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to ht
Hal Murray wrote: How did you get it apart?
The Motorola/Andrew antenna that I have has screws. Best I remember, I just
removed them and yanked the top off. I do believe there was a seal that had
to be overcome.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@feb
Thanks guys. I bookmarked that site. I don't know that I'll be able to find
one but at least I know what to look for now.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and fo
Mark Sims wrote:The quality of the results match the quality of the antenna.
A geodetic/survey grade antenna gives results to within a few inches. A
conical timing antenna within 8 inches. A cheap patch antenna around a
foot.
I took one of those conical timing antennas apart only to find that it
Interesting. It makes sense that it is the holder and not the crystal itself
that is sensitive. I only implied that the oscillator as a whole displayed
this sensitivity. While I didn't try to actually measure the change, I would
estimate it at almost 1e-8. I will try to use a strong magnet nearby t
A while back there was some discussion about crystal oscillator's changing
frequency due to the effects of gravity. Since I got my Z3801 up and running
full time, I have been trying to characterize some OCXOs I had picked off
eBay but had no specifications for. I was trying to fine tune one to the
Ulrich Bangert wrote:
my point has not been to judge who has to be interested in what. My point
has only been to use the right terms for it. Let me give an example: John
uses the term
> ...but I am more concerned with ... and stability over time
Well, stability over time is what exacly is display
Part of using this method is that, at some point, the DUT must be set to the
same frequency as the reference. (As close as I can get it anyway.) So,
accuracy and stability are addressed separately. For TCXOs, set to frequency
and watch the drift over time. I have an environmental chamber so I can d
I have studied the dual mixer approach and the consensus is that it is the
most accurate method. However, it seems pretty difficult to obtain that
accuracy. I do have some DBMs with IF response down to DC. I don't have a
10811 but do have a pretty good oscillator to use for the offset. The
problem
I've been hanging around and reading long enough to understand that when
measuring the differences between oscillators the preferred methods are the
HP 5370A Time difference counter or the dual mixer method. I want to
evaluate some ocxo's and Rb sources against either a Tbolt or Z3801 and I
don't h
A cheap and easy way is to use a 74HC14, 74HC390. Capacitively couple the 10
MHz into one of the 6 inputs of the HC14 to square it up, out of that into
one of the divide by 2 inputs of the HC390, that goes to another input of
the HC14 to act as a buffer which provides the 5 MHz output. Next, into t
I got the mute Tbolt talking so I let it sit to do it's self survey. Due to
a not so great view of the sky here at work, it took a couple of hours to
complete. Afterwards,everything seemed OK. (I am not at all familiar with
the Tbolt.) Next, I hooked up my Z3801 to the same antenna and it keeps
giv
I happened to notice that the 5 volt supply was set at around 4.9 volts, not
usually a problem. I upped it to 5.1 and started getting receive data
packets. As usual, an operator headspace problem. Thanks for all the help.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- tim
I opened the mute Tbolt up to check the solder connections on the DB9 and I
see it has version 2.2 firmware. How big a deal is it that it doesn't have
3.0? Also, it has the Trimble 37265 OCXO. I understand that there were good
and not so good OCXOs used in these. Is this one of the good ones?
_
I got one of the Chinese Tbolts off eBay and when I powered it up and ran
Tboltmon, I got nothing. I checked the com port and it is correct. I am
using a USB to serial converter but I don't believe that is what the problem
is since I have used it to program some Motorola radios that have a
reputati
Anyone have any info on this oscillator? Google turned up nothing. Thanks.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
This really more about frequency than time but I thought it might be of
interest. The Agilent 8920 series of instruments have an A15 module, the
reference, which takes an external 10 MHz input and locks an internal TCXO
to it then producing 1 GHz, 500 MHz, 20 MHz, 10 MHz, 1 MHz or 200 KHz
outputs.
I bought, but haven't received yet, one of the Datum LPRO units from eBay.
In trying to find information, I was able to locate some info on the
LPRO-101. However, looking at the picture on eBay, The model looks like
LPRO-FLX. Is this the same as the dash 101? Also, are these units nearing
the end
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo