In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Van Baak writes:
What about Jupiter's 10 KHz output under same conditions?
Yes, a Jupiter is next on the list. My expectation in all these cases
is that more pulses per solution does not give any additional timing
accuracy.
That depends what clock-frequency is
**
- Original Message -
From: Tom Van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:32 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] M12 100 Hz vs. 1PPS measurements
I know a number of you have been waiting
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WarrenS
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. Dezember 2008 16:04
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] M12 100 Hz vs. 1PPS measurements
Tom,
This is great work and Information to see.
I do think
1st question:
Does anyone have or can they tell me where to get a copy
of the actual raw data Tom used for these plots?
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12-adev/
I'm out of town at the moment and so can't yet address all
the other comments and questions about the M12. The raw
data:
WarrenS wrote:
Tom,
This is great work and Information to see.
I do think that this will inspire, and make if not a giant leap, at least a
small step to better GPSDO performance.
1st question:
Does anyone have or can they tell me where to get a copy of the actual raw
data Tom used for
I know a number of you have been waiting for the results of
this M12 experiment. I compared the performance of a 100 Hz
output vs. a 1PPS output vs. a 1PPS with sawtooth correction.
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12-adev/
I think it came out quite well and it may surprise some of you.
/tvb
Tom,
Interesting results - thank you. Is there a small problem with the graph
plotting routine though? On the left of the 100Hz
plots, at some tau there are two points above each other (5 + 7 * 10^-2), and
other tau have no data points (4, 6, + 8 * 10^-
2).
Peter
On Fri Dec 5 8:32 ,
Nice and useful
What about Jupiter's 10 KHz output under same conditions?
Predrag Dukic
At 09:32 5.12.2008, you wrote:
I know a number of you have been waiting for the results of
this M12 experiment. I compared the performance of a 100 Hz
output vs. a 1PPS output vs. a 1PPS with
, December 05, 2008 12:32 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] M12 100 Hz vs. 1PPS measurements
I know a number of you have been waiting for the results of
this M12 experiment. I compared the performance of a 100 Hz
output vs. a 1PPS output vs. a 1PPS with sawtooth correction.
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], WarrenS writes:
The short of it is that every once in a while the 100 Hz syncs up
for a short time to the 1 Hz
As far as I have ever been able to tell, that is not how it
works.
The 100Hz and 1Hz are generated with the same hardware and same
behaviour relative to
In message 02c801c956c9$4aa089a0$6401a8c0 at WSOffice, WarrenS writes:
The short of it is that every once in a while the 100 Hz syncs up
for a short time to the 1 Hz
As far as I have ever been able to tell, that is not how it
works.
The 100Hz and 1Hz are generated with the same hardware and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], WarrenS writes:
The short of it is that every once in a while the 100 Hz syncs up
for a short time to the 1 Hz
As far as I have ever been able to tell, that is not how it
works.
The 100 Hz is defiantly update or at least different on every cycle,
and has about the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
We are talking about different things here, you are talking about
collapsing the chosen (software) frequency (estimate) to phase
samples using the hardware, I'm talking about updates to the
(software) frequency (estimate).
Forgot to say: if
13 matches
Mail list logo
