In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Van Baak" writes: >> What about Jupiter's 10 KHz output under same conditions? >> >Yes, a Jupiter is next on the list. My expectation in all these cases >is that more pulses per solution does not give any additional timing >accuracy.
That depends what clock-frequency is used to generate the pulses. If that frequency is close to integer Hz, then it won't help much and we get all the usual trouble with "hanging bridges". If it is close to, but not quite a low modulus to 1Hz, N.33337 Hz for instance, it will help, because the 10.000 pulses will sample the "real" value and the average of them will give a sqrt(9999) ~= 100 times better resolution. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
