In the RC Model Airplane world where some brave souls are experimenting with
autonoumous (UAV) flight , it is usual that they have a part-15 video downlink
and/or telemetry at 900mhz or 2.4ghz and unless you put a trap on the input to
the GPS receiver to significantly reduce those frequencies i
time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:37 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
John Green wrote:
>
> jamming anyone's GPS. A while back,
On 23/11/10 16:12, jimlux wrote:
scmcgr...@gmail.com wrote:
The Phrack article's jammer attacks the offset frequencies.
Phrack.org/issues.html?issue=60&id=13
This article shows just how vulnerable L1 GPS is
I'm not very impressed by design...
That old Freescale/Motorola MC145151 PLL, and us
scmcgr...@gmail.com wrote:
The Phrack article's jammer attacks the offset frequencies.
Phrack.org/issues.html?issue=60&id=13
This article shows just how vulnerable L1 GPS is
I'm not very impressed by design...
That old Freescale/Motorola MC145151 PLL, and using a separate
prescaler? That's
John Green wrote:
I read that Phrack article and their jammer is much more sophisticated
than mine. Mine is just a sweeper. I don't even know yet the sweep
rate. I was thinking more along the lines of theirs. Something that
actually put out a signal that contained at least some aspects of the
sig
John Green wrote:
jamming anyone's GPS. A while back, I was looking at one of those
It doesn't look capable of putting out
more than 50 milliwatts or so into a 2 inch antenna
The GPS antenna is perhaps 35 feet away
with a cinder block wall, a brick wall, and a metal roof in between. I
also
I read that Phrack article and their jammer is much more sophisticated
than mine. Mine is just a sweeper. I don't even know yet the sweep
rate. I was thinking more along the lines of theirs. Something that
actually put out a signal that contained at least some aspects of the
signal they were intend
On 23/11/10 14:17, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
Most telecom systems are still a "timing monoculture". All of their sources
of time are duplicates of the same thing. There are multiple categories of
trouble that will affect all of their sources. Redundancy with multiple
types of timing is what would make
That's the stuff
you rarely if ever see.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 8:05 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
On 23/1
On 23/11/10 13:36, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you are going to depend on any form of over the air timing, you need holdover. It's
not a "option" its a requirement. There are simply to many things that can
create issues with the signal you are using. That's true of any over the air system, not
just
mber 22, 2010 20:38
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
>
> Hi
>
> If you run through the article the author claims that he's getting a few
> hundred feet of range with a few hundred mw of power
requency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
Hi
If you run through the article the author claims that he's getting a few
hundred feet of range with a few hundred mw of power into a good
antenna.
Your cell phone and FM broadcast radio are equally susceptible under
gt; From: Magnus Danielson
> Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:29:56
> To:
> Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
>
> On 11/23/2010 12:19 AM, Bob Camp wrot
: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:29:56
To:
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
On 11/23/2010 12:19 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> There is *very* little signal hitting the ground from a normal GPS bird. Even
On 11/23/2010 12:19 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
There is *very* little signal hitting the ground from a normal GPS bird. Even a
few mili watts close at hand is going to be an enormous overload. The typical
GPS does not use a lot of bits in the front end A/D.
I suspect that if you tuned your little
Hi
There is *very* little signal hitting the ground from a normal GPS bird. Even a
few mili watts close at hand is going to be an enormous overload. The typical
GPS does not use a lot of bits in the front end A/D.
I suspect that if you tuned your little gizmo down to the FM broadcast band, it
Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: John Green
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:43:12
To:
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] GPS jamming susceptibility
Given that this is an extremely
Given that this is an extremely sensitive topic and completely illegal
also, let me just state at the outset that I have no interest in
jamming anyone's GPS. A while back, I was looking at one of those
Chinese discount electronics websites, I'm sure we all have, and
noticed a GPS jammer for sale. I
18 matches
Mail list logo