I did a (rather crude - breadboard) experiment of using an analog vs XOR freq
doubler driving a flip flop. I did not see much difference between the $0.10
XOR doubler vs the $6 analog doubler.
Two $0.10 2P4T PCB mount slide switches would replace the relays. The total
parts cost for the
FWIW Re: the relays. I worked through the Omron discontinuation notices
for the first relay (I figure the original was a G5Y series, not GSY as in
the manual) and it looks like the G6K series, easily available at Mouser
and about $4 each would work, though you'd have to use a DPDT.
The other two
In message <8fdafefb-3563-94be-e68d-63fe00164...@earthlink.net>, jimlux writes:
>On 7/9/17 10:27 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> People *have* been known to sort MiniCircuits parts and use the “extras” in
>> something else. A certain major oscillator manufacturer once bought a bunch
>>
In message
,
Mark Sims writes:
>Also coax and RF relays cost a lot. Pretty soon your BOM cost
>is over what a 59992A will run... assuming you can find one.
The crucial feature of the 59992A was
> I hope the XOR doubler works well.
I think the initial comment about using a XOR mentioned a couple of gates for
delay.
A trick from the old FPGA days. You can guarantee that the pulse is wide
enough to clock a FF if you put a FF in the chain. That is replace the
gates-for-delay with a
I think it will take some testing to see if using an analog frequency doubler
or XOR digital doubler will provide the best performance. My gut says the
analog doubler ($6) will work better than the ($0.20) XOR doubler. I hope the
XOR doubler works well.
It would be even better if the
$38 is for the wideband 100 - 600MHz PSCJ-2-1W - you'd want the PSCJ-2-1+
which is a little less... $29.20 and no price break until you get 10 of
them.
Looking at the PSCJ-2-1+ datasheet, the "phase imbalance" at the output
ports is about 180 degrees. How they achieve that, they don't say.
On
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:55 AM, jimlux wrote:
> On 7/9/17 10:27 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> People *have* been known to sort MiniCircuits parts and use the “extras”
>> in
>> something else. A certain major oscillator manufacturer once bought a
>> bunch
>> of RPD-1’s
On 7/9/17 10:27 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
People *have* been known to sort MiniCircuits parts and use the “extras” in
something else. A certain major oscillator manufacturer once bought a bunch
of RPD-1’s , sorted them for the “one in a hundred” examples, and then returned
the rest for credit……
More like $18 for the simple splitter and $38 for the 180 phase shift splitter.
Also, does anybody know if the phase shift splitter shifts the phase on both
outputs or on only one output. Different HP docs say different things.
> The original parts were nothing special!
Hi
People *have* been known to sort MiniCircuits parts and use the “extras” in
something else. A certain major oscillator manufacturer once bought a bunch
of RPD-1’s , sorted them for the “one in a hundred” examples, and then returned
the rest for credit…… Somehow I doubt HP didi it quite that
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Mark Sims wrote:
> I think the way the fine cal works by checking the the intervals between
> four different edges that a lot of asymmetries in the signals are nulled
> out in the software.
>
> How good are 1:2 180 degree phase shifters at
Hi
> On Jul 9, 2017, at 9:35 AM, Francesco Messineo
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Mark Sims wrote:
>
>>
>> So far my design is tending towards: 10MHz ref input -> Minicircuits
>> doubler -> Wenzel squarer -> 74AC74 divider
With a sinewave input LF feedback from the 74AC04 output to the shaper inputs
could be used to regulate the output duty cycle by adjusting the switching
threshold. However ensuring that the input amplitude is sufficiently large to
override potential LF oscillation. The LF feedback will also
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Mark Sims wrote:
>
> So far my design is tending towards: 10MHz ref input -> Minicircuits doubler
> -> Wenzel squarer -> 74AC74 divider -> 74AC04 buffer -> level shifter. The
> doubler/divider might not be needed, but I think it will give
I think the way the fine cal works by checking the the intervals between four
different edges that a lot of asymmetries in the signals are nulled out in the
software.
How good are 1:2 180 degree phase shifters at exactly shifting by 180 degrees?
At what cost?
Also coax and RF relays cost
-2-mini board I tested the jitter using a
>> TimePod (integrated phase noise mode). I'm looking for the web page or
>> email now, but I recall it was under 2 ps. This is partly due to the fact
>> that the PIC 12F is a fully synchronous MCU; no tricks with double clock
>> edges or
tricks with double clock
> edges or PLL's.
> >
> > /tvb
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce Griffiths" <bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz>
> > To: "Mark Sims" <hol...@hotmail.com>; "Discussio
12F is a fully synchronous MCU; no tricks with double clock edges or
> PLL's.
>
> /tvb
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Griffiths" <bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz>
> To: "Mark Sims" <hol...@hotmail.com>; "Discussion
time and frequency
measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2017 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] J06 HP-59992A time interval calibrator for HP-531xx
counters
>A run of the mill 2 way power splitter has better than 10ps phase matching at
>100MHz there are
A run of the mill 2 way power splitter has better than 10ps phase matching at
100MHz there are few digital devices that offer that degree of matching at best
they are usually 10x worse.
Bruce
>
> On 09 July 2017 at 06:58 Mark Sims wrote:
>
> Yes, they do show
Yes, they do show up... but usually for big-ish bucks. I want to build a
small affordable replacement that anybody with a 531xx can have.
My design is currently leaning towards a board with the clock generator and a
5V reference for the gain calibration (they spec 5V +/- 1mV). I was
Mark wrote:
I need a simple and cheap circuit to level shift the TTL signal to +/- 0.50V
It probably needs clean, stable, fast edges and able to drive a 50 ohm load
See attached. The resistor values shown assume that the source is a
0-5v rectangular signal able to source +/- 10mA with
Hi
This may be “inside” the envelope for something like a PIC. If not it’s a
pretty
easy task for any of the sub $10 FPGA boards. Given the relatively small
audience, tacking an extra connector or three onto something might be the
better option.
The big unknown (at least to me) is how close
To do a full and proper calibration of the HP-53131/53132/53181 counters you
need a J06 HP-59992A time interval calibrator... lots of luck finding one of
those. Looking at the manual, it is actually a fairly simple device which can
be greatly simplified for the task of calibrating a 531XX
25 matches
Mail list logo