Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-09 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:50:41 +0200 Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: It is also why the CD media has changed rythmic music, which went from a love of distortion to a love of pure tones when the CD media made it possible to play loud pure tones. The late Julian Dunn has

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-09 Thread J. Forster
AES = Audio Engineering Society Google Julian Dunn audio -John = On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:50:41 +0200 Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: It is also why the CD media has changed rythmic music, which went from a love of distortion to a love of pure tones

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-09 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:43:25 -0700 (PDT) J. Forster j...@quikus.com wrote: AES = Audio Engineering Society Google Julian Dunn audio Thanks a lot... now i have more to read for those rainy evening ;-) Attila Kinali -- Why does it take years to find the answers to the

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Raj
I once did a test with a audio expert and compared a CD and a digital copy. He confirmed that the copy was the original and when I showed him which was which he still refused to believe.. I know a local guy who gold plated the PCBs for his home brewed amp! Raj At 07-05-2012, you wrote: These

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:40:15 +0530 Raj vu2...@gmail.com wrote: I once did a test with a audio expert and compared a CD and a digital copy. He confirmed that the copy was the original and when I showed him which was which he still refused to believe.. I know a local guy who gold plated the

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread MailLists
Let's expect the ultimate portable MP3 player with atomic clock reference... :] Also funny are the offerings with RbO CD-clocks... usually tweaked FE-5680s, which are not exactly famous for a clean jitter/spurious free output signal... The only reason is the easiness of output frequency

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Javier Herrero
El 07/05/2012 11:20, Attila Kinali escribió: But to bring this back to time nutty topics, have a look at http://www.colorfly.eu/product.html It's an MP3 player with high precision timing. It does not only use two TCXOs with 5ps Jitter.. No! It also employes a technique known as Jitter Kill for

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Rob Kimberley
An old saying: a fool and his money are often parted. Sums things up nicely I feel. Rob Kimberley -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Javier Herrero Sent: 07 May 2012 11:30 To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Chris Stake
How does the fool get his money? Chris Stake -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Rob Kimberley Sent: 07 May 2012 11:55 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Raj
But to bring this back to time nutty topics, have a look at http://www.colorfly.eu/product.html It's an MP3 player with high precision timing. It does not only use two TCXOs with 5ps Jitter.. No! It also employes a technique known as Jitter Kill for the ultimate mobile sound experience! :-)

[time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Burt I. Weiner
/search?w=Power+Cords Burt, K6OQK From: Rob Kimberley robkimber...@btinternet.com To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear An old saying: a fool and his money are often parted. Sums things up nicely I feel. Rob

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Rob Kimberley
@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Oh dear A friend of mine signed me up for a catalog from the Audio Advisor. He said I deserved this - I was afraid to ask what he meant by that! Spend a few minutes looking over this site: http://www.audioadvisor.com/ Be sure to check out their Power cords at: http

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 226574.14407...@smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com, Burt I. Weiner w rites: Be sure to check out their Power cords at: http://home-audio.audioadvisor.com/search?w=Power+Cords I always wondered how the distortion could stop right at the power outlet, but I see that somebody has cornered

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread J. Forster
Nope. Any Audiophool knows green electricity sounds much better, without any artifacts produced by those annoying carbon atoms in coal, oil, or natural gas, rattling around producing annoying distractions. -John In message 226574.14407...@smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com,

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Jim Lux
On 5/7/12 7:39 AM, Burt I. Weiner wrote: A friend of mine signed me up for a catalog from the Audio Advisor. He said I deserved this - I was afraid to ask what he meant by that! Spend a few minutes looking over this site: http://www.audioadvisor.com/ Be sure to check out their Power cords at:

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Frederick Bray
And for those who want a good debunking article to show to their non-technical friends: http://www.audioholics.com/education/cables/power-cables On 5/7/2012 8:01 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message226574.14407...@smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com, Burt I. Weiner w rites: Be sure to check

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 52252.12.6.201.2.1336403114.squir...@popaccts.quikus.com, J. Fors ter writes: Any Audiophool knows green electricity sounds much better, without any artifacts produced by those annoying carbon atoms in coal, oil, or natural gas, rattling around producing annoying distractions. Unless,

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Dan Rae
All this kerfuffle about that Rubidium Clock kind of misses the point. This is not some Audiophool thing but a serious piece of gear used for recording studios. I am not going to get into the pricing of it, but if you add up the cost of a /new/ Rb unit, distribution amp, power supply and

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4fa7e639.9090...@earthlink.net, Jim Lux writes: Well.. this is where folks on this list can do the world a service.. The whole thing about timing, stability, phase noise, Allan deviations, etc. *is* complex, and it's tricky to come up with easy to understand, short, descriptions of

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Robert Lutwak
- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Burt I. Weiner Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 10:39 AM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Oh dear A friend of mine signed me up for a catalog from the Audio Advisor. He said I deserved this - I was afraid

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Knox
+0100 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear I must get one of their line cords to see if it will improve my timing system!! You just have to laugh at this nonsense. Rob K -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Burt I

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread J. Forster
A crummy crystal oscillator zero beated to WWV is good to 1 in 10E6, a Rb disciplined to GPS maybe 1 in 10E11. Do you seriously think you, or anybody, can hear a pitch difference of 0.001 Hz in the audio range? A quartz crystal is plenty good for any audio application, IMO. -John =

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Chris Albertson
In message 226574.14407...@smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com, Burt I. Weiner w rites: Next step will be to try to sell them electricity produced on turbogenerators aligned to the earths magnetic field in order to deliver minimal low unharmonic distotion... I've been thinking I should be

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 Dan Rae dan...@verizon.net wrote: I see nothing odd about wanting to get the best possible source for the Master Clock for your master recordings. My son does run a small studio and for him I was able to make a version of that unit, for a lot less money

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Knox
65,536 possible levels in 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz formats. Thomas Knox Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:59:04 +0200 From: att...@kinali.ch To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 Dan Rae dan...@verizon.net wrote: I see nothing odd about

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Knox
Actually in digital audio playback timing is just as important except that there is no was to remove jitter during poor recordings. Thomas Knox Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 From: dan...@verizon.net To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear All this kerfuffle

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:02:25 -0600 Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote: Actually the numbers are quite real, play with the math, a small amount of jitter in a DAC (X) can have a large difference (Y) when sampling a complex wave form especially in the audiophile world where the sound of 24bit

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 7 May 2012 18:19:19 +0200 Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Of course, you have to keep the clock signal clean of any disturbance that might add modulations to it. But that's a matter of keeping the power supply clean and having the signal shielded. It's not an inherent property

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread MailLists
dac 16,777,216 discrete levels is clearly superior to older 16 bit dac 65,536 possible levels in 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz formats. Thomas Knox Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:59:04 +0200 From: att...@kinali.ch To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 Dan

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread J. Forster
It has nothing to do with engineering. Artists, and I use the word with a huge bag of salt, are often Prima Donnas. They are under the illusion that their works are masterpieces, because they sell millions of copies on iTunes or elsewhere, or theit concerts are sold out in two minutes. So,

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 5/6/2012 7:39 PM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidium-Atomic-Clock-/270809581736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item3f0d8248a8 Make sure you read the description to discover what it's being sold for. My chuckle for the day. Jim Palfreyman

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:20:55 -0700 Dan Rae dan...@verizon.net wrote: I see nothing odd about wanting to get the best possible source for the Master Clock for your master recordings. You are right about that. But there are

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Bob Camp
just might be something to worry about. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Attila Kinali Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:19 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Don Latham
Isn't long term stability an oxymoron? Or, put another way, a Murphy Mantra? Don MailLists Let's expect the ultimate portable MP3 player with atomic clock reference... :] Also funny are the offerings with RbO CD-clocks... usually tweaked FE-5680s, which are not exactly famous for a clean

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 5/7/2012 2:20 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:40:15 +0530 Rajvu2...@gmail.com wrote: I once did a test with a audio expert and compared a CD and a digital copy. He confirmed that the copy was the original and when I showed him which was which he still refused to believe..

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread J. Forster
Suppose you have a perfect, ideal clock that puts out 'convert' pulses at an exact rate is used to strobe a high precision A/D. Now suppose you add jitter to that perfect clock so that the rate stays the same but time interval between successive pulses varies randomly between P(1-x) and P(1+x).

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Don Latham
One of my other avocations is precision shooting. I would not like to engage in a contest to see which bunch of aficionados has more folklore Don Javier Herrero El 07/05/2012 11:20, Attila Kinali escribió: But to bring this back to time nutty topics, have a look at

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread lists
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear If you take into consideration that the best currently available DACs, also true for analog circuits, have a dynamic range about 120-126dB, the last

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread MailLists
measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear If you take into consideration that the best currently available DACs, also true for analog circuits, have a dynamic range about 120-126dB, the last 3-4 bits are quite irrelevant (random noise mostly)... a good 20bit DAC already

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4fa7fb9b.3040...@yahoo.com, Randy D. Hunt writes: On 5/6/2012 7:39 PM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidium-Atomic-Clock-/270809581736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item3f0d8248a8 Make sure you read the description to discover what it's

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message d2251f0f290d4b1ab54e1a4dba345...@vectron.com, Bob Camp writes: If you extend the bandwidth down low enough (as in low audio) the jitter goes up quite a bit. In the case of audio, jitter at low frequencies just might be something to worry about. Not with the kind of physical laws I

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 62172.12.6.201.2.1336409319.squir...@popaccts.quikus.com, J. Fors ter writes: Suppose you have a perfect, ideal clock that puts out 'convert' pulses at an exact rate is used to strobe a high precision A/D. Now suppose you add jitter to that perfect clock so that the rate stays the same

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread David
Analog Devices and Linear Technology have application notes on this subject. At least with sampling converters, jitter directly limits dynamic range. My back of the envelope calculation comes up with about 25ps of RMS jitter for an ideal 16 bit sampling converter at audio frequencies but most

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4fa80913.7000...@medesign.ro, MailLists writes: That was a big problem with the dynamic range of tape recorders, which had to be solved with noise reduction circuits. Even good 16 bit ADCs have a higher DR than the SNR of most instruments in quiet recording studios. Not so fast

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Dan Mills
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 18:15 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: We must start out by defining the acceptable level of total distortion, if we choose 0.5% then we need 200 digital levels, roughly 8 of your 16 bits for the signal. That gives you a headroom of 7 bits (leaving one for the sign)

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 1336415866.16321.14.camel@laptop, Dan Mills writes: On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 18:15 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: 16 bits is actually fine as a distribution format, Yes, I agree with that, and lets use that agreement to stop the topic :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: We must start out by defining the acceptable level of total distortion, if we choose 0.5% then we need 200 digital levels, roughly 8 of your 16 bits for the signal. That gives you a headroom of 7 bits (leaving one

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 05/07/2012 08:15 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message4fa80913.7000...@medesign.ro, MailLists writes: That was a big problem with the dynamic range of tape recorders, which had to be solved with noise reduction circuits. Even good 16 bit ADCs have a higher DR than the SNR of most

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message cabbxvhuasdq-mwug6fmwc4ln-d3zkhegvpvvbpcprwxewgf...@mail.gmail.com , Chris Albertson writes: You are mixing recording and distribution. The 16-bit 44.1K CD Quality is for distribution to consumers. I'm old enough to have listend to comparisons when 16 bit 44.1KHz was _both_ recoding

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Chris Albertson
New question about jitter in recording.I was reading some time ago about non-uniform sampling. Basically the time between samples is random (or as random as you can make it) But now you have to sample a clock AND the signal. Or more likely use a psuedorandon sample interval that can be

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message cabbxvhtad_ewe_ptrmkifkrywzjfhw3xmypfev6b5su3xw+...@mail.gmail.com , Chris Albertson writes: Advantages are that you can sample higher frequency than 1/2 the average sample rate and alieasing is less a problem. Disadvantage: on playback you get both a sample and a standard deviation

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Hal Murray
j...@quikus.com said: Suppose you have a perfect, ideal clock that puts out 'convert' pulses at an exact rate is used to strobe a high precision A/D. Now suppose you add jitter to that perfect clock so that the rate stays the same but time interval between successive pulses varies randomly

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Michael Blazer
-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear An old saying: a fool and his money are often parted. Sums things up nicely I feel. Rob Kimberley Burt I. Weiner Associates Broadcast Technical Services Glendale, California U.S.A. b...@att.net www.biwa.cc K6OQK

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear - can we please close this thread

2012-05-07 Thread SAIDJACK
-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear An old saying: a fool and his money are often parted. Sums things up nicely I feel. Rob Kimberley Burt I. Weiner Associates Broadcast Technical Services Glendale, California U.S.A. b...@att.net www.biwa.cc

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread David I. Emery
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:28:41AM -0700, J. Forster wrote: A crummy crystal oscillator zero beated to WWV is good to 1 in 10E6, a Rb disciplined to GPS maybe 1 in 10E11. Do you seriously think you, or anybody, can hear a pitch difference of 0.001 Hz in the audio range? A quartz crystal

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread J. Forster
It's kinda a trick question. The important thing is 'before anyone could detect any differences in the sound?' I was involved in making a decision to go with brand A or B speakers in a roughly 1200 seat auditorium. There was a lot of political pressure to choose brand B. IMO, brand A sounded

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-07 Thread Had
May we PLEASE go back the the intended purpose of this list. Hadley K7MLR A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well. Peter Cooper, of Fermi Lab, says, Every experimentalist knows that the apparatus, or at least your understanding of it, is always at fault until

[time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread Jim Palfreyman
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidium-Atomic-Clock-/270809581736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item3f0d8248a8 Make sure you read the description to discover what it's being sold for. My chuckle for the day. Jim Palfreyman ___

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread paul swed
It makes the audio sound better. Just like tubes and oxygen free speaker cables. Darn he has 8 offers already. Must say the front panel is much nicer then what I build. Regards Paul On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread J. Forster
For the 'Golden Ear' crowd An Audiophool and his money are easily parted by a good sales pitch. The same suckers buy $250,000 turntables and solid silver speaker wires. YMMV, -John

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread Bill Hawkins
Swiss-made? FEI 5660? PRS10? US $5,995? Oh, dear indeed. Nice to know the fiscal predators have predators to bite 'em. Bill Hawkins -Original Message- From: Jim Palfreyman Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:40 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] Oh

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread Tom Curlee
, Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com Subject: [time-nuts] Oh dear To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Date: Sunday, May 6, 2012, 7:39 PM http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidium-Atomic

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread shalimr9
and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Oh dear http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio-Isochrone-10M-Rubidium-Atomic-Clock-/270809581736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item3f0d8248a8

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread David
) that this new cutting edge technology provides. And, you won't need to darken the edges of your CDs with a black felt tipped pen any longer. --- On Sun, 5/6/12, Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com Subject: [time-nuts] Oh dear To: Discussion of precise time

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread DaveH
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear Instead of making fun of the web site, we all need to be more entrepreneurial so that we can fleece, errr, that is, offer a superior product to the audiophiles out there.  Think of the add copy: You don't

Re: [time-nuts] Oh dear

2012-05-06 Thread DaveH
: [time-nuts] Oh dear For the 'Golden Ear' crowd An Audiophool and his money are easily parted by a good sales pitch. The same suckers buy $250,000 turntables and solid silver speaker wires. YMMV, -John http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Antelope-Audio