[time-nuts] Shorthand

2012-07-23 Thread g4gjl
Is there a commonly accepted shorthand for a frequency, say 10MHz, generated at the maximum accuracy of the lab generating it? ie instead of writing 10.5MHz? Pete G4GJL ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Shorthand

2012-07-23 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, 5E-10, valid for every frequency. On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:50 PM, g4...@btopenworld.com wrote: Is there a commonly accepted shorthand for a frequency, say 10MHz, generated at the maximum accuracy of the lab generating it? ie instead of writing 10.5MHz? Pete G4GJL

Re: [time-nuts] Shorthand

2012-07-23 Thread Tom Van Baak
5 mHz above 10 MHz +0.5 ppb error +5e-10 /tvb - Original Message - From: g4...@btopenworld.com To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 1:50 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Shorthand Is there a commonly accepted shorthand for a frequency, say 10MHz, generated at the maximum

Re: [time-nuts] Shorthand

2012-07-23 Thread Jim Lux
On 7/23/12 3:23 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote: Hi Pete, Yes, there are several ways to represent frequencies: 1) Absolute units of Hz. For example 60 Hz, or 32.768 kHz, or 3.579545 MHz, or 9.192631770 GHz. Note some modern texts use s⁻¹ (1/s or s-1) instead of Hz or Hertz. Or, you can always show