That's one thing that annoys me with those graphs. If you average jitter
it loses its meaning. What you then get is the mean deviation (aka offset).
Without an accompanying standard deviation (and a test that you actually
have a gausian distribution) this value is not worth much.
What I am
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:47:09 -
"David J Taylor" wrote:
> I'm also using PPS with the BBB - you even commented on my Web page!
>
> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/BBB-vs-RPi.html
Yes, I know. But I didn't mention your webpage, because there is something
weird
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:47:09 -
"David J Taylor" wrote:
I'm also using PPS with the BBB - you even commented on my Web page!
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/BBB-vs-RPi.html
Yes, I know. But I didn't mention your webpage, because there is something
weird going
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:37:08 -
"David J Taylor" wrote:
> hanks, Attila. I'm unsure where you are getting the figures from, but the
> graph shows 2.5 µs averaged jitter:
>
> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/2015-03-21-23-BBB_jitter.png
>
> with the reduced OS,
A couple of people have. If you look at the archives you'll find
a few of those. Dan Drown sticks out a bit here, as he is AFAIK
the only one who used a GPIO as a PPS input on the BBB:
(last mail seen around december 2014)
http://blog.dan.drown.org/beaglebone-black-timer-capture-driver/
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:27:40 -0800
jimlux wrote:
> Has anyone fooled with using NTP on a beaglebone black running Debian
> (the beagleboard.org image)?
>
> I assume it's just a matter of turning on ntpd (which I'm not sure is
> even installed) and/or running ntpdate (I'm
Has anyone fooled with using NTP on a beaglebone black running Debian
(the beagleboard.org image)?
I assume it's just a matter of turning on ntpd (which I'm not sure is
even installed) and/or running ntpdate (I'm not looking for super
accuracy.. it's for a sprinkler timer)
jim...@earthlink.net said:
> Has anyone fooled with using NTP on a beaglebone black running Debian (the
> beagleboard.org image)?
Works fine for me.
I'm building from source to help test the latest bits rather than running the
binary packages they provide. I don't remember anything
The Debian 8.x (jessie) releases for the BeagleBone run systemd-timesyncd,
which is installed and on by default. As long as the Beaglebone is hooked
to the internet, it has correct time to +/- 10 milliseconds or so.
Probably good enough for a time-nut lawn sprinkler.
systemd-timesyncd is a
Me. It's pretty straight forward. "apt-get install ntp"
-Bob
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:27 PM, jimlux wrote:
> Has anyone fooled with using NTP on a beaglebone black running Debian (the
> beagleboard.org image)?
>
>
> I assume it's just a matter of turning on ntpd (which
Has anyone fooled with using NTP on a beaglebone black running Debian
(the beagleboard.org image)?
I assume it's just a matter of turning on ntpd (which I'm not sure is
even installed) and/or running ntpdate (I'm not looking for super
accuracy.. it's for a sprinkler timer)
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jimlux wrote:
> Has anyone fooled with using NTP
>
You can apt-get (in alphabetic order) chrony, ntp (sntp) or openntpd.
You can also build ntimed-client.
As I recall the obvious installation assumes a RTC.
12 matches
Mail list logo