On 10/31/15 7:32 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
So … how good is the “calibrate and go” (not the tone on second channel)
approach likely to be?
If it’s a bare crystal or normal XO (not a TCXO) that is supplying the clock,
the crystal will follow some
fairly well known curves. Which one of the curves
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Magnus Danielson
> wrote:
>
> Some people is very fond of using the frequency measure of counters, I've
> grown more and more sceptic to it for a number of reasons when doing ADEV and
> friends, then I use TI that avoids a number of
Hi
So … how good is the “calibrate and go” (not the tone on second channel)
approach likely to be?
If it’s a bare crystal or normal XO (not a TCXO) that is supplying the clock,
the crystal will follow some
fairly well known curves. Which one of the curves it follows will depend
entirely on
Chris,
Can a soundcard be locked to GPS instead of its own internal crystal for
precise frequency output?
I do not know which soundcard you have in mind - hope to be not totally
off-topic.
I use a KS-24361 10MHz signal at the Mutec MC-3+ reference input to feed
MC-3+ generated word clock with
Chris:
If by "purely mathematical" you mean with infinite precision and infinite
accuracy in the calculations, then the answer is "No."
The counter is using integer mathematics, in a world with propagation
delays and clock jitter, and uncontrolled phase relationships.
So resulting rounding
On 10/31/15 3:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
31/10/2015 10:46
I have a Racal counter locked to 1 MHz on its rear panel external
input socket from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPS. I derive the 1 Mhz
from a David Partridge divider board. If I also feed the counter
with the 10 Mhz
Hi Chris,
On 10/31/2015 11:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
31/10/2015 10:46
I have a Racal counter locked to 1 MHz on its rear panel external
input socket from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPS. I derive the 1 Mhz
from a David Partridge divider board. If I also feed the counter
with
Am Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:50:36 +
schrieb Chris Wilson :
>
>
> 31/10/2015 10:46
>
>I have a Racal counter locked to 1 MHz on its rear panel external
>input socket from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPS. I derive the 1 Mhz
>from a David Partridge divider board. If
Chris welcome to the group.
Several comments.
The 1 or 2 Hz most likely is trigger and jitter. Its somewhat odd that you
are off by 2 Hz. Typically its 1 Hz.
I suspect you are also working 136 KHz. With respect to sound cards the
internal clock could be replaced and locked if its at all
Hi
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
>
>
> 31/10/2015 10:46
>
> I have a Racal counter locked to 1 MHz on its rear panel external
> input socket from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPS. I derive the 1 Mhz
> from a David Partridge divider board. If I
On Sat, October 31, 2015 10:03 am, Graham / KE9H wrote:
> The sound card sampling clock is
> usually derived from some master clock in the computer, such that the
> sound card is running in the same clock domain as the rest of the
computer, so
> you more likely need to GPS lock the whole computer.
> As an aside, I work low frequency RF transmissions on 136 Mhz, and
> very narrow bandwidth. Can a soundcard be locked to GPS instead of
> its own internal crystal for precise frequency output?
Chris,
It might first be interesting to see how far off the frequency is before you
worry
Hi Chris and Bob,
On 10/31/2015 02:13 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
On Oct 31, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
31/10/2015 10:46
I have a Racal counter locked to 1 MHz on its rear panel external
input socket from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPS. I derive the 1
Hi
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Magnus Danielson
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris and Bob,
>
> On 10/31/2015 02:13 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 31, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 31/10/2015 10:46
>>>
>>>
. Someone who has done soundcard FFT
programming might have a better idea.
Bob
From: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Beginner
15 matches
Mail list logo