Hi
At least in my “unconstrained by reality” state, my thought is that the “sync”
PPS signal is there all the time.
You are as much doing a phase lock as a sync. The “PLL” only has a phase
resolution of 100 ns so once
it’s running, not much happens. Yes, this might get you into all sorts of
level. And it also takes into account any propagation delays on your
board, connector and cables.
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: "John Ackermann N8UR" <j...@febo.com>
To: <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New Timest
Hi Bob --
It's certainly possible to synchronize the TICC timescale epoch to an
external pulse at startup. The external sync pulse would have to
simultaneously reset (a) the picDIV and (b) the coarse (100us) counter
in the Arduino. The signals to do that are available, so it's a
worthwhile
Hi
Ok, so the guess was fairly close :)
How about a connector to allow an external PPS to reset the internal 10 MHz
divider? That way all
the data is “in sync” with the house standard. If I want to know that my GPSDO
is +32.751 ns off from
the house standard, I just look at the data on a
Good guess. The 10 MHz reference drives all the logic on the board, and
particularly the counter that maintains a local timescale in 100us
increments; the TDC7200 interpolates between the 100us ticks to stamp
incoming events on channel A and/or B with picosecond precision. The
stamps on both
Hi Luciano --
Glad to hear that!
The capability you asked for already exists (great minds think alike...)
In timestamp mode, the TICC will output the stamps for each channel
independently, measured against the common 10 MHz reference. So if both
channels are active, you'll see a bunch of
Hi
Without doing a bunch of actual *work* I’m not sure what is inside the guts of
the board. Being
lazy I’ll just guess ….
There appears to be a 10 MHz time base input and a pair of measurement inputs.
In a lot us will
be comparing to a “house standard”. That standard has a pps output that
Hi John,
I have planned to buy two TICC.
An interesting feature would be to be able to do two simultaneous acquisitions,
and Timelab as real time display,using the two indipendent input channels and
the 10Mhz clock as single reference.
Luciano
www.timeok.it
From "time-nuts"
ot;John Ackermann N8UR"<j...@febo.com>
Date: 2016/11/25 22:57:33
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement"<time-nuts@febo.com>;"David"<mcqu...@sonic.net>;
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New Timestamping / Time Interval Counter: the TICC
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement"<time-nuts@febo.com>;"David"<mcqu...@sonic.net>;
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New Timestamping / Time Interval Counter: the TICC
Hi Dave --
I should clarify -- this UI is just a character-based menu
Hi Dave --
I should clarify -- this UI is just a character-based menu system using
a dumb terminal program. The code is implemented within the Arduino.
It's written in the somewhat nonstandard C/C++ used by the Arduino IDE.
This morning I'm going to add a "TODO-UI" file to the git
John,
In what language is the GUI written? I might be able to help on that,
or other parts of the software, if someone else hasn't yet volunteered.
Dave, WA8YWQ
On 2016-11-24 06:43, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> Hi Anders --
>
> Thanks, and thanks for the info on the 53230A. I have not
John
Whilst its the highest resolution HP/Agilent/Keysight general purpose counter,
one of the Acquiris timestamping instruments specifies 5ps noise.Whilst no
detailed circuit schematics are publicly available, the datasheet says just
enough to allow me to figure out how they do it.Your
Thanks, Bruce, I'll update the web page to reference the 53230A as the
best resolution device currently available.
On 11/24/2016 01:03 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
John
There is an application note or similar on the 53230A that indicates that
the single shot noise for time interval measurement
On 11/24/16 6:43 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Hi Anders --
Thanks, and thanks for the info on the 53230A. I have not used one of
those myself but the data sheet lists 20ps single-shot.
Also I should note that the TICC does not compete with counters like the
53230A for high speed
John
There is an application note or similar on the 53230A that indicates that
the single shot noise for time interval measurement is typically about 13ps
or so.
Bruce
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 09:43:54 AM John Ackermann N8UR
wrote:
> Hi Anders --
>
> Thanks, and thanks for the info on
Thanks, Andrew. Yes, it is weird how the Arduino folks choose what
capabilities to expose on the board. From some testing I did, it seems
that the Arduino handles the 100 kHz interrupt rate without too much
strain -- it became a bigger issue at 250 kHz or above -- but the timers
would have
Hi Anders --
Thanks, and thanks for the info on the 53230A. I have not used one of
those myself but the data sheet lists 20ps single-shot.
Also I should note that the TICC does not compete with counters like the
53230A for high speed measurement, or frequency counting. It does far
fewer
1-2ps rms single shot noise timestamping is feasible with embedded (occurs as
part of the interpolation process) interpolator calibration. Only calibration
of the differential delay between channels is required, as is required by all
such instruments.
However the cost for such a timestamping
Nice work!
On the website in the introduction you mention 22ps single-shot
time-stamping on the 5370A/B.
I think it's well established that the 53230A does about 11-12 ps for
time-intervals, which corresponds to about 9 ps single-channel. see for
example:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:48 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> The TICC is implemented as a two-channel timestamping counter. That means
> it can measure one or two low-frequency (e.g., pulse-per-second) inputs
> against an external 10 MHz reference, or it can do a traditional
Fantastic John - well done! Yes, I'll definitely put an order in as soon
as possible.
Regards,
Peter (G8ZZR, London)
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
That TI TDC7200 really is a nice part.
Neat project! Will buy . Two thumbs up.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:48 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> Counters with resolution below 1 nanosecond are difficult. They require
> either outrageous clock speeds, or interpolators that are
Hi
Cool !!!
Bob
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:48 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>
> Counters with resolution below 1 nanosecond are difficult. They require
> either outrageous clock speeds, or interpolators that are typically a bunch
> of analog components mixed with black magic
24 matches
Mail list logo