In my post below I didn't understand how a constant electromagnet on
the side of the pendulum could adjust the pendulum rate.
Well I've worked it out. Despite common misconceptions pendulum swing
rate is not independent of amplitude. It is to the first order but not
when calculated properly.
The
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
not attempt to understand the source of the errors and work on
-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Holmstrom
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 12:47 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives
Le 09/08/2010 18:46, Bob Holmstrom a écrit :
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
not attempt to
clock.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of mike cook
Sent: 09 August 2010 18:21
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Le 09/08/2010 18:46, Bob
cook
Sent: 09 August 2010 18:21
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Le 09/08/2010 18:46, Bob Holmstrom a écrit :
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09 August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
You
can put into a pendulum clock.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of mike cook
Sent: 09 August 2010 18:21
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Le 09/08
August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
You could put a large mass of concrete or somehing above the clock and
crank it up and down, to balance out the computed gravity changes.
:)
-John
: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09 August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time
: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:17 PM
To: j...@quik.com; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf
put into a pendulum clock.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of mike cook
Sent: 09 August 2010 18:21
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Le 09/08
Ahhh, this is more like it! Large gears and thick ropes moving
heavy weights up and down. :)
Of course, you wouldn't want anything digital doing this. Just
a large pendulum clock driving a maze of gears that calculate
solar and lunar positions.
Bill Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: J.
Oh Dear!
What have I started? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Hawkins
Sent: 09 August 2010 21:36
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Nah! No ropes or gears. Just a SS tank on steel stilts and a big mercury
reservoir and a pump.
And it might not have to hold tons. Think of a hollow SS donut with the
pendulum in the clear space.
KISS,
-John
===
Ahhh, this is more like it! Large gears and thick ropes moving
There are many pieces of technology developed in the 20th century
that have not been applied to pendulum clocks.
My take on much of the technology is that it is too volatile to be of
use in making a better clock. The task is not to keep better time,
that has already been done with
Hi Ian,
Unfortunately Gravity is not constant. Pendulum clocks show cyclic errors
due to the influences of the Moon's and Sun's Gravitational fields. I
forget
the amounts but it is in the region of parts in 10 to the 7, which is
easily
measurable.
This limits the compensations one can
pressure
effects.
Bob
--
From: b...@lysator.liu.se
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:07 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Hi Ian,
Unfortunately
In principle, there is no real reason a Rb, Cs, ot atomic fountain could
not be made to last a very, very long time in a lab. It would certainly be
possible to design a source that is either continuously fed from the
outside or a pair of sources that can be changed to maintain continuous
Bob Holmstrom wrote:
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling it
with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why not
attempt to understand the source of the
Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
For that matter, how hard is it to put it in a vacuum with temperature
control? Gets two big issues out of the way pretty fast. We certainly buy
crystal oscillators that are heated and enclosed in pressure tight
containers (not quite the same as vacuum, but close).
Bob
Ian Sheffield wrote:
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09 August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating
Javier Herrero wrote:
Not so simple... you should move it around in order to balance the
gravity force vector :)
Regards,
Javier
two large masses rotating around the pendulum, one synchronized with the
sun, one sync'd with the moon.
Having just looked up the orrery stuff, a suitable
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Advisable given the required mass will probably be in the 10-100 ton range.
Bruce
J. L. Trantham, M. D. wrote:
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
Wait a minute.. is it that big? or is it much, much bigger..
Inverse square is involved.
The moon's mass
I screwed up by a factor of a million..
jimlux wrote:
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Advisable given the required mass will probably be in the 10-100 ton
range.
Bruce
J. L. Trantham, M. D. wrote:
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
Wait a minute.. is it that big? or is it much,
All this talk about regulating a pendulum clock... are you people buying
them, building them, or what?
I'm interested! I keep thinking about it and something keeps bringing me
back to the bob being a neodymium magnet itself. I'm sure you can guess
where I'm headed with that...
73 Brice
-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
All this talk about regulating a pendulum clock... are you people buying
them, building them, or what?
I'm interested! I keep thinking about it and something keeps bringing me
back
This is very interesting and I wonder if the capabilities of this
system being applied to any clock pendulum. If this sort of control
any pendulum, then I wonder if it's possible to sync it to some
standard.
Steve
On 08/08/2010, Don Mimlitch donm...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jim Said:
It also has a coil
This is very interesting and I wonder if the capabilities of this
system being applied to any clock pendulum. If this sort of control
any pendulum, then I wonder if it's possible to sync it to some
standard.
Steve
On 08/08/2010, Don Mimlitch donm...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jim Said:
It also has a coil
Sorry for double post, modem dropped during sending and a refresh on
the browser when it was up resent the message.
Steve
On 08/08/2010, Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very interesting and I wonder if the capabilities of this
system being applied to any clock pendulum. If this
Not many clocks are set up with the gear to modulate the rate,
but they are all still sensitive to injection locking.
A tiny rare earth magnet on the pendulum (say 1/2 way down the
pendulum rod)
and a coil fed with a stretched (say 250ms long) PPS or for a seconds
pendulum
PP2S pulse will
I was rather more thinking of the setup that Don was suggesting as not
many domestic clocks have a seconds pendulum and it would otherwise
take dividing down a referenced oscillator to the correct frequency.
Cheers,
Steve
On 08/08/2010, Neville Michie namic...@gmail.com wrote:
Not many clocks
Check out Bryan Mumfords page.
http://www.bmumford.com/clocks/em2/index.html
Le 08/08/2010 11:14, Steve Rooke a écrit :
I was rather more thinking of the setup that Don was suggesting as not
many domestic clocks have a seconds pendulum and it would otherwise
take dividing down a referenced
The attached single ended inverting driver is perhaps a better choice as
it allows a dc coupled noniverting amplifier with gain and significant
offset and drift to be substituted for the LT1010 buffer depicted if the
frequency compensation is adjusted to suit.
The series RC across the coil
On 08/08/2010, mike cook mike.c...@orange.fr wrote:
Check out Bryan Mumfords page.
http://www.bmumford.com/clocks/em2/index.html
I did not want to kick the pendulum with a pulse each swing as the
drive would be part and parcel of the existing clock mechanism. What I
was interested in was Don
Hi all,
I think at this point I need to explain the electromagnet positioning.
The permanent magnet is on the rod about 25cm down (out of 100cm). The
electromagnet is on the left side and so gets close to the permanent
magnet every two seconds.
Injection locking would be a simple solution and
the location of a
weight along the pendulum.
-RL
---
--
From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 7:30 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum
:29 PM
To: j...@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
The 60mA load current would be problematic for most common opamps
without an output buffer stage.
High voltage opamps are relatively rare.
Bruce
J. Forster wrote
You are picking very unimportant nits.
If there were a small noise spike from the opamp, it'd goose the pendulum
a tiny amount. That would be corrected on the next swing.
You are turning a trip to the corner store into an Apollo Moon Mission.
BTW, since the =drive does not to be bipolar, one of
That's why I suggested killing the BW of the opamps in the partial H
bridge configuration previously suggested. Transient response is almost
unneeded.
-John
==
On 08/08/2010, mike cook mike.c...@orange.fr wrote:
Check out Bryan Mumfords page.
J. Forster wrote:
You are picking very unimportant nits.
If there were a small noise spike from the opamp, it'd goose the pendulum
a tiny amount. That would be corrected on the next swing.
Heuristic analysis of this type is counter productive.
You are turning a trip to the corner store into
Hmmm lemme see. I think I'd use a 12 volt supply and two transistors
driven by two outputs on my Arduino,basic stamp,picaxe or other whizzie.
I'd then implement a PID controller essentially using the 1 sec pulse from
the pendulum and the 1 sec pulse from my Rb, satellite receiver, crystal
clock,
No protection against external shorts or other undesired events.
Extensive analog filtering to avoid creating an effective radiator of
noise may also be necessary.
Simple analog techniques are probably simpler/cheaper once the necessary
filtering and protection are included.
Bruce
Don Latham
fast blow fuse, resonate the coil to the pwm frequency. Parts count small,
tinkering in software instead of breathing lead fumes or whatever noxious
stuff the Europeans have forced us to use...
Don
Bruce Griffiths
No protection against external shorts or other undesired events.
Extensive analog
Mere fast blow fuses aren't usually precise enough to protect
transistors against over current unless one uses rather large transistors.
Overcurrent protected drivers are available and readily designed/built.
Protection against di/dt transients due to external events is also
advisable.
Well last night I did a quick and dirty.
I got my (GPS locked) 3325B to generate square waves (0-5V) at 1 Hz. 500ms
on. 500ms off. I ran this through a relay that delivered 10mA at 25V to the
coil.
By adjusting the phase of the 3325B I got the ON to occur as the magnets
approached. But I had no
Now I will get myself in a lot of trouble.
Why wouldn't a constant pulse at a 2 sec interval essentially lock the
pendulum after a bit.
If the pulse is always there and occurs just after the mid swing. I suspect
you do need to adjust current with a pot to get things settled. But
essentially open
-
From: Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Mere fast blow fuses aren't usually precise enough to protect transistors
Nice!
Don
- Original Message -
From: Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock (Jim Palfreyman)
Well last night I did
Yep, injection locling works just fine
Don
- Original Message -
From: paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Now I will get
A high voltage opamp (or a low voltage opamp with a discrete output
stage with a voltage gain of at least 2) with -3V and + 30V supplies is
perhaps the simplest method.
The opamp merely senses the current flowing in a current sensing
resistor and regulates this voltage drop to equal the output
Since it's inside a closed loop, the design is uncritical.
One option is a high voltage Op-Amp with +/- 25 to 30 VDC supplies. You
would set the OA gain to about 10, so 2.5 V in would yield 25 V out. and
sum in a negative offset voltage so that +2.5 from the DAC yields 0.0 V
out. I'd use
Hi,
the range of the adjustment is probably far wider than you would ever
need
as you will be applying it continuously instead of over a few hours
to correct the clock to the latest
observations.
So all you need is an amplifier run off + and - 15 Volts with enough
gain for the DAC output.
The 60mA load current would be problematic for most common opamps
without an output buffer stage.
High voltage opamps are relatively rare.
Bruce
J. Forster wrote:
Since it's inside a closed loop, the design is uncritical.
One option is a high voltage Op-Amp with +/- 25 to 30 VDC supplies.
A high voltage opamp (or a low voltage opamp with a discrete output
stage with a voltage gain of at least 2) with -3V and + 30V supplies is
perhaps the simplest method.
The opamp merely senses the current flowing in a current sensing
resistor and regulates this voltage drop to equal the output
OK. You know better.
BTW, op-amp noise is essentially irrelevant in this application, and the
C's across the FB resistors limit slew rates so there is no significant
dI/dt to cause voltage spikes.
-John
Your naive stabilisation scheme wont work, try simulating it.
741's are
J. Forster wrote:
OK. You know better.
BTW, op-amp noise is essentially irrelevant in this application, and the
C's across the FB resistors limit slew rates so there is no significant
dI/dt to cause voltage spikes.
Noise is never irrelevant.
You havent shown that its insignificant either.
57 matches
Mail list logo