As long as you don't have sunset or sunrise between you and the transmitter,
WWVB is reasonably stable. At night you will get more signal, but also can
have some skywave stuff in the mix.
One man's noise is another man's signal.
The NIST coverage maps vary widely from night to day. I
On 7/19/2012 1:30 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
As long as you don't have sunset or sunrise between you and the transmitter,
WWVB is reasonably stable. At night you will get more signal, but also can
have some skywave stuff in the mix.
One man's noise is another man's signal.
The NIST coverage maps
Hi
The zero crossing is very arbitrary. If it's correct at the transmit site, it
will then be off everywhere else by the speed of light / distance. You will
appear to be correct once every wavelength away from Colorado (roughly every 3
miles). You won't really be correct because you are
Bob
Yes nights are bad for me, east coast and MSF interference.
So it could be any number of 60 KHz crossing its just odd it lined up the
way it did and I double confirmed that I was not doing something silly like
using alternate triggers.
Very careful analysis does show a 1-2 us jitter and at
Paul,
On 07/14/2012 10:56 PM, paul swed wrote:
Bob
Yes nights are bad for me, east coast and MSF interference.
So it could be any number of 60 KHz crossing its just odd it lined up the
way it did and I double confirmed that I was not doing something silly like
using alternate triggers.
As
Hi
Well between now and midnight, you will completely loose signal at least once.
It's a pretty dramatic amplitude dip as sunset gets right to the wrong place.
Bob
On Jul 14, 2012, at 4:56 PM, paul swed wrote:
Bob
Yes nights are bad for me, east coast and MSF interference.
So it could be
Might loose the signal not unusual and it did shift +5-8 us tonight aligned
to the diurnal shift.
So maybe this is not so crazy of an approach.
Regards
Paul
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
Hi
Well between now and midnight, you will completely loose signal at
