There's also a few cars, trucks, emergency vehicles, hand-helds and
timing receivers that he didn't bother to mention at all. I suspect most
of those would be fixed by complete replacement. (If a full fix is
even possible in all situations.)
On 3/6/2012 7:37 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
I'm
I'd accept if they replaced the whole worlds GPSes, it is a cheap option as
they claim!
I'd like the latest model of smart phone too when you are at it L2!
Cheers
Raj
I'm sorry, but Mr. Javad is on crack.
A simple WAAS upgrade on a GENERAL AVIATION aircraft already costs about
$8000 fully
Hello Folks,
I found in my collection a frequency standard that I acquired mil surplus at
one time.
The model number of 2N6625-078-4718 internet search yields nothing on this
number.
The unit is a common looking one , approx. 4 x 3 x 4 with an aluminum
cover that comes off.
The cover has
The model number of 2N6625-078-4718 internet search yields nothing on this
number.
Remove the 2N from the gaggle and you'll have a standard number sequence that
Google has some info
for you.
RP
..._._
Paul A. Cianciolo paulc at snet.net
The cover has the layout of the parts. The connector has 6 coax outputs
into a D type connector.
+
It sounds like the R-1051/URR receiver frequency standard. There is some info
on
repairing it here:
I have a software program, no longer supported, which requires two RS232
serial com port interfaces, one to communicate with a sensor (signal
strength collection receiver) and the second to accept serial data from
a GPS.
The laptop computer I am using has only one RS232 Com port which I must
On 3/6/2012 10:37 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but Mr. Javad is on crack.
Yeah right. In what world does he live in?
The one in which he's head of the only company who offers GNSS
receivers with ... LightSquared Inside.
http://javad.com/jgnss/javad/news/pr20110921.html
It's all very squalid!
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FCC Chair
Talks Spectrum, Gets GPS Letter From: Mike S To: time-nuts@febo.com CC:
On 3/6/2012 10:37 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but Mr. Javad is on crack.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Joe Leikhim jleik...@leikhim.com wrote:
I would like to use a Delorme USB type receiver on the USB port. Can
anyone recommend a software add on that will make this type receiver appear
as a standard RS232 Com port to my software?
Unless Delorme makes a driver
Hi
My guess is that your software isn't just looking for a serial port. It's
also looking for specific strings back from the GPS. Depending on what you
attach, it may or may not give you the strings you need. If you are doing
timing, a USB interface will be a major headache.
Most sensor = usb
Hi
The annual sales of GPS devices are around $5B (yes with a B) a year. Let's
say that you only replace those sold over the last four years. He's only off
by about 1000X *assuming* the new ones are as cheap as the old ones...
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Rob wrote:
Javad got into bed with Lightsquared and now things are not working as
planned he is throwing his toys out of the pram.
Javad was hoping to profit from making (and/or perhaps licensing the
technology to make) retrofit filters. Some would have been paid for
by LS (presumably at
What a tangled web we weave. . .
Don
Charles P. Steinmetz
Rob wrote:
Javad got into bed with Lightsquared and now things are not working as
planned he is throwing his toys out of the pram.
Javad was hoping to profit from making (and/or perhaps licensing the
technology to make) retrofit
Ogg: [time-nuts] military frequency standard pin out??
Paul A. Cianciolo paulc at snet.net
The cover has the layout of the parts. The connector has 6 coax outputs
into a D type connector.
+
It sounds like the R-1051/URR receiver frequency standard. There is some info
Hi
The gotcha here is that frequency standard is a relative term. For what
ever reason, these were a high failure item in the R-1051. People talk about
seeing large piles of them at repair depots. The replacement contracts often
went to outfits that had little experience in the OCXO business.
Good Morning Paul,
Sounds like a very old military unit. Probably 60's vintage.
before the 13 digit NSNs.
national stock number (NSN) is probably 6625-078-4718.
I do not recall what the 2N could mean.
a modern NSN would look like 6625-00-078-4718 or 6625-01-078-4718
Stan, W1LE on Cape
6625-078-4718 - * Frequency Standard Module from R-1051* and
RT-618* radios; usable as replacement or adapt to other need where
standard is required. Crystal oven with 5 MHz crystal provides 5 MHz
sine wave output (approx 1.8V) plus possible non-sine outputs dual
500KHz, 1 10 MHz. Designed
Sorry for my language, I was quite upset when I read his letter.
If it really was trivial and very low cost to upgrade GPS receivers, then
he should not worry too much about loosing much revenue. This sounds more
like he made major investments in either Lightsquared itself, or into
Hi Bob,
Yes.. that is what I am trying to find out. But I dont want to chance it
till I know for sure what the power requirements are.
Thanks for the heads up though, I did not realize the bad rep these had.
Paul A. Cianciolo
W1VLF
http://www.rescueelectronics.com/
Our business computer
I used to rebuild these units many years ago and they were quite a good
oscillator - these units would be good for a few parts in 10-9 and 10-8.
73,
Bill, WA2DVU
Paul A. Cianciolo paulc at snet.net
The cover has the layout of the parts. The connector has 6 coax
outputs into a D type
They were dogs though - I worked on mine for repairing 1051 rx - seemed
failure rate was more than 50 % - took 2 or three to make a good unit! But
when you made one work they were quite accurate considering their age.
73,
Bill, WA2DVU
Hi Bob,
Yes.. that is what I am trying to find out. But
On 03/07/2012 07:22 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry for my language, I was quite upset when I read his letter.
If it really was trivial and very low cost to upgrade GPS receivers, then
he should not worry too much about loosing much revenue. This sounds more
like he made major investments in
I think it is amusing, and sad at the same time, that Javad claims that his
position is the one where technology is losing out to politics.
Maybe he thinks the bulk of the population and the FCC really are that
stupid and gullible? Did I really just defend those two groups?
Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Tipp
Following recent discussions on the partial resurgence, for now anyway, of
Loran-C in the US I have uploaded the Austron 2100 Loran-C Timing receiver
manual to Rapidshare, with many thanks to Dan Rae who provided the printed
original.
As with my previous manual uploads this is created from
Which manual? 2100F?
-John
Following recent discussions on the partial resurgence, for now anyway, of
Loran-C in the US I have uploaded the Austron 2100 Loran-C Timing
receiver
manual to Rapidshare, with many thanks to Dan Rae who provided the
printed
original.
As with my
Suck it and see:-)
In a message dated 07/03/2012 23:05:52 GMT Standard Time, j...@quikus.com
writes:
Which manual? 2100F?
-John
Following recent discussions on the partial resurgence, for now anyway,
of
Loran-C in the US I have uploaded the Austron 2100 Loran-C Timing
I picked up a MicroLogic ML200 Loran-C a long time ago, and after playing
a bit with it, shelved it, as not really usable for time-nuts purposes.
Now, during the yearly cleaning of my lab, I dragged it out and powered
it up, and it still seems to work, sometimes.
I opened it up, and discovered
Found very little googling for this ML200, found only a line in the 1977
Radionavigation Journal...
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
I picked up a MicroLogic ML200 Loran-C a long time ago, and after playing
a bit with it, shelved it, as not really
In message cal8xpmoo_arncqvmt65xko5ai7xz2xd1bdxfxm1dnzuruqr...@mail.gmail.com
, Azelio Boriani writes:
Found very little googling for this ML200, found only a line in the 1977
Radionavigation Journal...
Yes, found that too. There's also a report where it was used in van
measuring loran-C on
I've been using Delmore GPS receivers for several years. They have a
driver (http://support.delorme.com/questions.php?questionid=24
http://support.delorme.com/questions.php?questionid=24) for Windows
that will install it as a standard serial port sending NMEA messages.
The older serial
I read a white paper Javad put out touting their new (and cheaper to
build) front end filter. Of course it is patented. So guess where
everyone has to go should LS get the green light.
Mike
On 3/7/2012 12:22 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry for my language, I was quite upset when I read
Filtering is basically what is done by those skilled in the art. I think it
would be hard to defend such a patent.
Then again, Apple has managed to patent and defend in court the ipad color
scheme.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Blazer mbla...@satx.rr.com
Sender:
Last seen, the 4004 chips were much in demand (perhaps by gamers)
-John
In message
cal8xpmoo_arncqvmt65xko5ai7xz2xd1bdxfxm1dnzuruqr...@mail.gmail.com
, Azelio Boriani writes:
Found very little googling for this ML200, found only a line in the 1977
Radionavigation Journal...
Personally, I would be opposed to LS even if they *did* offer to
replace every GPS in the world at their cost. The real issue here is
more fundamental - if you are going to allow people to operate high
power terrestrial based transmitters in a designated satellite
downlink band then what is the
Pete wrote:
I suppose you can't really blame LS for trying it on - the real fault
lies with the FCC for not shooting the idea down completely when it
was first suggested.
The regulatory notion is ancillary terrestrial component
(ATC). Its original purpose (conceived in the early '90s) was
On 3/7/12 10:22 AM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry for my language, I was quite upset when I read his letter.
If it really was trivial and very low cost to upgrade GPS receivers, then
he should not worry too much about loosing much revenue. This sounds more
like he made major investments in
Multipath propagation issues?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipath_propagation
We can certainly throw computational power against that wall but I think
that this would be an issue for TV stations.
AM should be better
DaveH
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Following recent discussions on the partial resurgence, for now anyway,
of
Loran-C in the US I have uploaded the Austron 2100 Loran-C Timing
receiver
manual to Rapidshare, with many thanks to Dan Rae who provided the
printed
original.
[]
Regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
My thanks to Dan and Nigel for
mbla...@satx.rr.com said:
I read a white paper Javad put out touting their new (and cheaper to build)
front end filter. Of course it is patented. So guess where everyone has
to go should LS get the green light.
Was that filter included as part of the recent round of testing? Did it
Has anybody asked them how good timefreq they're trying to deliver ?
I would assume that they are aiming for a backup for GPS in
telecom-GPSDO context.
If so, frequency stability is priority number one and time is
probably just better than 100msec or so
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
In message 2561.12.6.201.116.1331169308.squir...@popaccts.quikus.com, J. For
ster writes:
Last seen, the 4004 chips were much in demand (perhaps by gamers)
And chip-collectors
But they're not leaving that receiver as long as there is smoke in them.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
41 matches
Mail list logo
