); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sputnik
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 22:05:15 EDT
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
>
> In a message dated 1
> a related very interesting experiment is to take the Horizontal Sync signal
> from an old Tube-type TV, and feed it to a frequency counter with GPSDO time
> base (preferrably).
>
> Got to be careful about the high voltages inside the TV though!
If you use proximity EM field pickup you don't
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Ulrich,
I'll be glad to. It's here, somewhere :-)
Didier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulrich Bangert
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 11:18 AM
> To: 'D
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 10/5/2007 16:28:21 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>OK, not really a time related post...except for the clock in the CD
>player...which begs the question, any time nuts play with creat
gt; time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> __ InformaciĆ³n de NOD32, revisiĆ³n 2575 (20071006) __
>
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado con
OK John - yes that does sound different, and the clues look quite strong! I
offered the info on the basis that many manufacturers tend to use a fairly
standard pin-out - but maybe not this time!
73,
Dave
- Original Message
From: John Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion of precis
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi, Dave --
That doesn't sound entirely comparable to this one, unfortunately. I do
have a partial clue: the seller left about a centimeter of wire on each of
the 6 terminals. They are:
1 Gray
2 Pink/black
3 Bright red
4
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> If the sample rate is 44.1 kHz then the adev below 1 s, even
> down to 10 us, or jitter, or the phase noise above 1 kHz are
> they key parameters; not long-term drift. In this case I'd take
> a nice 10811A over a typical Rb an
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi John,
I don't have this particular OAM Unit - I have a model 42-23 - but I do have
the pin-out for it, and it sounds very similar to what you describe, so maybe
this will be helpful.
Viewed from above - ie as you would lo
Does anyone have access to the schematics for a Gigatronics 1026 signal
generator (50 MHz - 26.5 GHz)? If so, any chance you could look up the 10
MHz OCXO's pinout for me? I just picked up the OCXO from someone parting
out a 1026, but have no other information on it, and I'm guessing the only
hop
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
The current issue of Inside GNSS has a final update on Galileo and GPS
bandplans and the coding for each signal.
Galileo will carry the new SARSAT, receiving from 406 to 406.1MHz then
broadcasting these signals on sub-carriers
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi, Ulrich --
I only support the GPIB0 device name in my package, so it's easy enough in
my case to do an ibfind("GPIB0"). If that returns >= 0 (and the ERR flag is
not set in the returned value), then I do an ibonl(GPIB0,0) t
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
You are way incorrect in your reply. Since this is off-topic I will limit my
reply to a few salient points.
High definition CD is not at 44.1KHz It is much higher so your ratio is off.
The A/D and D/A converters they use are
On Oct 6, 2007, at 18:48, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> When faced with claims that picosecond jitter can be perceived by
> the human ear, my flim-flam-o-meter blows a fuse.
>
> A 1 nsec phasemodulation of a 44100 kHz clock signal will, worst
> case, come out to an noise component 87 dB below the in
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I have paid my dues in the HiFi world, but I have always insisted that
there be a solid scientific basis for any product I bought.
When faced with claims that picosecond jitter can be perceived by
the human ear, my flim-flam-o
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Didier,
> I do not have a plug-in NI card (I do have a USB type
> controller from NI
> though) so I am not sure what I am going to say will work,
> but it's worth a try.
I am not sure by 100%, just say 99 % but I believe tha
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
You are not off base. I know the inventor of the high definition CD standard and
he has the patents on the mastering system. He had made for his company a
special piece of test equipment to measure picosecond jitter. I questione
Ulrich,
I do not have a plug-in NI card (I do have a USB type controller from NI
though) so I am not sure what I am going to say will work, but it's worth a
try.
I believe the IEEE-488 controller has its own address (that is not often
used, but the IEEE-488 spec requires that), so you should be a
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Gentlemen,
I know this is a bit OT but otherwise I also know that some of you are
well acquainted to IEEE-488 data acqusition:
Suppose I can test whether the National Instruments DLL for their range
of IEEE-488 interfaces is a
On Oct 6, 2007, at 3:01, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>>
>> If the sample rate is 44.1 kHz then the adev below 1 s, even
>> down to 10 us, or jitter, or the phase noise above 1 kHz are
>> they key parameters; not long-term drift. In this case I'd take
>> a nice 10811A over a typical Rb any day. Does a
20 matches
Mail list logo