Hi,
Jose's correct. Co-channel TV stations are accurately offset by a
fraction of the line frequency. Interestingly enough (and for this
reason) independent TV stations often have very accurate transmitter
frequencies, while potentially having quite poor (1e-6 or so) control of
the picture
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Ah-ha!
Satellite broadcasters have poor stability - not necessarily so.
Many years ago (about 1978, actually) we were sending a signal from
Johannesburg to UK by satellite. In our control room, we could see both the
signal
As one who has worked in the pro digital audio field for years, I can
tell you that sub-100 ps jitter very definitely can be heard,
depending on its spectrum. Modern sigma-delta ADCs and DACs use
oversampling clocks of 12 to 50 MHz for sample rates of 44.1 kHz to
192 kHz at 24-bit resolution
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Oct 8, 2007, at 20:04, David McGaw wrote:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
As one who has worked in the pro digital audio field for years, I can
tell you that sub-100 ps jitter
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
As one who has worked in the pro digital audio field for years, I can
tell you that sub-100 ps jitter very definitely can be heard,
depending on its spectrum. Modern sigma-delta ADCs and DACs use
oversampling clocks of
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Van Baak writes:
It's also interesting when two list members disagree by so
many tens of dB, so I'm hoping David and PHK can settle
this for us.
I doubt it, at the end of the day, much of
Tom Van Baak wrote:
As one who has worked in the pro digital audio field for years, I can
tell you that sub-100 ps jitter very definitely can be heard,
depending on its spectrum. Modern sigma-delta ADCs and DACs use
oversampling clocks of 12 to 50 MHz for sample rates of 44.1 kHz to
192
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] from Sputnik to CD
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:02:24 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Bruce,
You have been more precise than this in other posts. Can you put
some numbers behind the sigma delta DAC's sensitivity to jitter?
Twenty years ago, the process control community got all jittery
about the jitter in the
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Just noting a few points made recently on this topic.
Do not confuse the Studio colour subcarrier frequency
(4.43 or 3.58 MHz) accuracy - or the digital equivalent
clock frequency - with the TV transmitters carrier
frequency
Bill Hawkins wrote:
Bruce,
You have been more precise than this in other posts. Can you put
some numbers behind the sigma delta DAC's sensitivity to jitter?
Twenty years ago, the process control community got all jittery
about the jitter in the execution period of function blocks. The
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: Kit Scally [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [time-nuts] TV Frequency control - slightly O/T.
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:28:55 +1000
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
