Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread Dr. David Kirkby

On 05/25/11 07:39 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:

If the radio's clock can be trimmed with a voltage,
why not divide the radio's 20 MHz clock by two and
feed the result into the GPSDO in place of the GPSDO's
10 MHz oscillator.



It can not be trimmed via a voltage. Also, I'm not keen to require an external 
reference.


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

You also may want to avoid an oscillator with much 10 MHz content in it. All 
sorts of odd things can happen with spurs when you have unplanned stuff on the 
main reference. Another thing to look closely at is - how much of the radio 
tracks the reference? On some radios, they don't really lock everything up. You 
get better performance, but not quite what you would expect.

Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:

 On 05/25/11 07:39 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
 If the radio's clock can be trimmed with a voltage,
 why not divide the radio's 20 MHz clock by two and
 feed the result into the GPSDO in place of the GPSDO's
 10 MHz oscillator.
 
 
 It can not be trimmed via a voltage. Also, I'm not keen to require an 
 external reference.
 
 -- 
 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
 A: Top-posting.
 Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread David Kirkby
On 27 May 2011 15:21, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 Hi

 You also may want to avoid an oscillator with much 10 MHz content in it. All 
 sorts of odd things can happen with spurs when you have unplanned stuff on 
 the main reference. Another thing to look closely at is - how much of the 
 radio tracks the reference? On some radios, they don't really lock everything 
 up. You get better performance, but not quite what you would expect.

 Bob

Yes, a band-pass filter would seem sensible here.

To the best of my knowledge, everything is locked to this 20 MHz, so
there should be a significant improvement.

However, I must admit as to wondering whether its worth the bother. I
have a Yaesu FT-ONE, which is a pretty poor design, despite it was the
top of the line Yaesu transceiver in its day (~1982) costing $3000. It
has a synthesizer for 100 Hz steps and then uses a varicap diode to
get the 10 Hz steps! This is not very stable, but in practice is
stable enough. There's nothing much one can do about that - perhaps
keeping the temperature constant in the vicinity of the varicap and
other critical components would help. But it also suffers from the use
of more than one reference, so hard to really stabilise.

The Kenwood TS-940SAT should be a lot more stable anyway. The Kenwood
actually seems a lot better technically to me, despite it costs only
$2000 and was released about the same time as the Yause FT-ONE. The
Kenwood TS-940S has a built in ATU (not even an option on the Yaesu
FT-ONE), FM (optional on the Yaesu FT-ONE), TCXO (not even optional on
the Yaesu).


I might however look at using a TCXO o OCXO in the Kenwood.

Dave

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread Mark Spencer
Imho phase noise is probably as important as long term stability in this 
application.

On Fri May 27th, 2011 10:51 AM EDT David Kirkby wrote:

On 27 May 2011 15:21, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 Hi

 You also may want to avoid an oscillator with much 10 MHz content in it. All 
 sorts of odd things can happen with spurs when you have unplanned stuff on 
 the main reference. Another thing to look closely at is - how much of the 
 radio tracks the reference? On some radios, they don't really lock 
 everything up. You get better performance, but not quite what you would 
 expect.

 Bob

Yes, a band-pass filter would seem sensible here.

To the best of my knowledge, everything is locked to this 20 MHz, so
there should be a significant improvement.

However, I must admit as to wondering whether its worth the bother. I
have a Yaesu FT-ONE, which is a pretty poor design, despite it was the
top of the line Yaesu transceiver in its day (~1982) costing $3000. It
has a synthesizer for 100 Hz steps and then uses a varicap diode to
get the 10 Hz steps! This is not very stable, but in practice is
stable enough. There's nothing much one can do about that - perhaps
keeping the temperature constant in the vicinity of the varicap and
other critical components would help. But it also suffers from the use
of more than one reference, so hard to really stabilise.

The Kenwood TS-940SAT should be a lot more stable anyway. The Kenwood
actually seems a lot better technically to me, despite it costs only
$2000 and was released about the same time as the Yause FT-ONE. The
Kenwood TS-940S has a built in ATU (not even an option on the Yaesu
FT-ONE), FM (optional on the Yaesu FT-ONE), TCXO (not even optional on
the Yaesu).


I might however look at using a TCXO o OCXO in the Kenwood.

Dave

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Looking at this in terms of time nut type stability - you really want to lock 
the 20 MHz up to something like a TBolt. At that point you have a wire out the 
back of the radio and all that implies. Keeping the ground loops and RF issues 
at bay in a transmitter is not trivial. For a timing receiver something like a 
R1051 or an R6790 might be a better starting point. 

If it's an internal oscillator (because of the various issues) - spend the time 
to dig up a 20 MHz part. You loose the Time Nut / WWV is off by 0.0001 Hz 
capability. You gain a spur free radio that doesn't do something odd when you 
transmit at frequency  using mode . 

A lot of outfits had a hard time with the sub 100 Hz synthesizer steps back 
before modern PLL and DDS chips came out. Many of the big boys in the military 
radio business put out radios that had very predictable spurs from the fine 
tuning synth. They can be a real pain if the idea is to track something like 
WWV and extract carrier phase or timing from it.

Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 10:51 AM, David Kirkby wrote:

 On 27 May 2011 15:21, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 Hi
 
 You also may want to avoid an oscillator with much 10 MHz content in it. All 
 sorts of odd things can happen with spurs when you have unplanned stuff on 
 the main reference. Another thing to look closely at is - how much of the 
 radio tracks the reference? On some radios, they don't really lock 
 everything up. You get better performance, but not quite what you would 
 expect.
 
 Bob
 
 Yes, a band-pass filter would seem sensible here.
 
 To the best of my knowledge, everything is locked to this 20 MHz, so
 there should be a significant improvement.
 
 However, I must admit as to wondering whether its worth the bother. I
 have a Yaesu FT-ONE, which is a pretty poor design, despite it was the
 top of the line Yaesu transceiver in its day (~1982) costing $3000. It
 has a synthesizer for 100 Hz steps and then uses a varicap diode to
 get the 10 Hz steps! This is not very stable, but in practice is
 stable enough. There's nothing much one can do about that - perhaps
 keeping the temperature constant in the vicinity of the varicap and
 other critical components would help. But it also suffers from the use
 of more than one reference, so hard to really stabilise.
 
 The Kenwood TS-940SAT should be a lot more stable anyway. The Kenwood
 actually seems a lot better technically to me, despite it costs only
 $2000 and was released about the same time as the Yause FT-ONE. The
 Kenwood TS-940S has a built in ATU (not even an option on the Yaesu
 FT-ONE), FM (optional on the Yaesu FT-ONE), TCXO (not even optional on
 the Yaesu).
 
 
 I might however look at using a TCXO o OCXO in the Kenwood.
 
 Dave
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread francesco messineo
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mark Spencer mspencer12...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 Imho phase noise is probably as important as long term stability in this 
 application.


for real and serious amateur radio dxing it's much more important the
phase noise and IMD3 performance of the RX rather than stability. Not
that stability doesn't matter, but I'd never trade not excellent PN
for stability.
Best regards

Frank IZ8DWF

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz?

2011-05-27 Thread Perry Sandeen
List,

How about the LM1496 IC DBM? Simple and cheap.

Regards,

Perrier



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz?

2011-05-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

As mentioned earlier, phase noise is critical. That would be the main issue. 
The original suggestion of a diode rectifier doubler has a much lower noise 
floor. Done from scratch they don't cost much at all. 

Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Perry Sandeen wrote:

 List,
 
 How about the LM1496 IC DBM? Simple and cheap.
 
 Regards,
 
 Perrier
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What's the best way to double 10 MHz to 20 MHz ?

2011-05-27 Thread Mark Spencer
Yep.  But in this case the original poster was looking to improve stability.   
Perhaps a better way to have phrased my comment would have been to ensure that 
the phase noise is not degraded vs the original xtal oscilator.   I do agree 
though that phase noise is very important.  As a side note I became interested 
in time nut topics after I purchased a gpsdo to compare the tcxo in my icom 
706mkiig to.   I then needed to convince my self the the gpsdo was accurate etc 
(:

I did conclude that the tcxo in my icom 706mkiig was jumping by a few tenths of 
a ppm from time to time (:

On Fri May 27th, 2011 12:17 PM EDT francesco messineo wrote:

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mark Spencer mspencer12...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 Imho phase noise is probably as important as long term stability in this 
 application.


for real and serious amateur radio dxing it's much more important the
phase noise and IMD3 performance of the RX rather than stability. Not
that stability doesn't matter, but I'd never trade not excellent PN
for stability.
Best regards

Frank IZ8DWF

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Alberto di Bene

I left my Thunderbolt running with Lady Heather started. Returning after a few 
hours in the room,
which is at a constant temperature (underground, no heating, no air 
conditioning), I found the
following plot on the Lady Heather screen :

http://www.sdradio.eu/images/ladyheather.gif

which shows a narrow and pronounced peak in the temperature.

Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?

TNX

73  Alberto  I2PHD


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread francesco messineo
Hi Alberto,

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Alberto di Bene dib...@usa.net wrote:
 I left my Thunderbolt running with Lady Heather started. Returning after a
 few hours in the room,
 which is at a constant temperature (underground, no heating, no air
 conditioning), I found the
 following plot on the Lady Heather screen :

 http://www.sdradio.eu/images/ladyheather.gif


since the plot has a step jump, seems only a few tens mC, and then it
comes slowly back to the normal track, I'd rule out at least an
external temperature change: the thunderbolt can easily detect an hand
in its proximity even for a few seconds, but I don't remember ever
seen a step change.
Could be a firmware/sensor/communication error, but I'm not able to
explain why it comes back to normal slowly (but I'm sure there's a
firmware reason for that).

Frank IZ8DWF

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Alberto di Bene

On 5/27/2011 8:59 PM, francesco messineo wrote:

since the plot has a step jump, seems only a few tens mC, and then it
comes slowly back to the normal track, I'd rule out at least an
external temperature change: the thunderbolt can easily detect an hand
in its proximity even for a few seconds, but I don't remember ever
seen a step change.
Could be a firmware/sensor/communication error, but I'm not able to
explain why it comes back to normal slowly (but I'm sure there's a
firmware reason for that).

Frank,

   thanks. I can obviously rule out a hand or a body in proximity of the GPSDO,
as when that happened I was alone in the house and moreover the door was locked.

I would tend to consider it some sort of glitch either in the firmware or in the
temperature sensor. I would be curious to know if somebody else has ever 
observed
in his Thunderbolt a similar phenomenon.

73  Alberto  I2PHD


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread David VanHorn


 Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?

Ghosts, of course!

Likely an issue with the temp sensor, their conversion isn't necessarily flat.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you watch the thermometer on the TBolt for long enough, you will indeed see 
narrow temperature spikes. The gif you posted is a very typical spike. They are 
fairly rare and they don't repeat. I believe LH averages the readings it gets, 
so they may simply be a noise burst. The initial jump is the noise pop, and the 
decay is the averaging taking it out. 

Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 3:32 PM, David VanHorn wrote:

 
 
 Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?
 
 Ghosts, of course!
 
 Likely an issue with the temp sensor, their conversion isn't necessarily flat.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread EWKehren
I have seen it, as a matter of fact two days ago I did see a straight jump  
in excess of 1 C. I have seen it before. I do not monitor constantly, but 
will  keep an eye out.
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 5/27/2011 3:19:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
dib...@usa.net writes:

On  5/27/2011 8:59 PM, francesco messineo wrote:
 since the plot has a step  jump, seems only a few tens mC, and then it
 comes slowly back to the  normal track, I'd rule out at least an
 external temperature change:  the thunderbolt can easily detect an hand
 in its proximity even for a  few seconds, but I don't remember ever
 seen a step change.
  Could be a firmware/sensor/communication error, but I'm not able to
  explain why it comes back to normal slowly (but I'm sure there's a
  firmware reason for that).
Frank,

thanks. I can  obviously rule out a hand or a body in proximity of the 
GPSDO,
as when that  happened I was alone in the house and moreover the door was 
locked.

I  would tend to consider it some sort of glitch either in the firmware or 
in  the
temperature sensor. I would be curious to know if somebody else has  ever 
observed
in his Thunderbolt a similar phenomenon.

73   Alberto   I2PHD


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Arnold Tibus
I confirm Bob's statement.

Such spikes seem to be normal. I am running T-Bolts already since the
begin of the time nut action initiated by Tom (TvB) and with a temp
resolution of 20m°C. I observed always such spikes up to a few times a
day. I do not see a real practical problem.

Arnold

Am 27.05.2011 21:41, schrieb Bob Camp:
 Hi
 
 If you watch the thermometer on the TBolt for long enough, you will indeed 
 see narrow temperature spikes. The gif you posted is a very typical spike. 
 They are fairly rare and they don't repeat. I believe LH averages the 
 readings it gets, so they may simply be a noise burst. The initial jump is 
 the noise pop, and the decay is the averaging taking it out. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On May 27, 2011, at 3:32 PM, David VanHorn wrote:
 


 Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?

 Ghosts, of course!

 Likely an issue with the temp sensor, their conversion isn't necessarily 
 flat.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread WarrenS

Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?


Short answer is the spike is caused by the temperature sensor.
This is very typical on all Tbolts at certain temperatures,
which depend on the temperature's rate of change and direction.
You can change LH's temperature display resolution to hide the small spikes 
by using G T S 1000 enter.


More details:
The Tbolt uses a special method to get high resolution data from its 
temperature sensor by combining three things.
The first is the sensor's standard data output which is used for the most 
significant bits. This gives about 1 deg resolution.
2nd an internal register is used for the middle bits which gives resolution 
of 0.009 deg
and then the Tbolt's firmware averages the internal register data to get the 
LS bits, with resolution (not accuracy) below 0.001 deg.


The return Time constant you see after the jump is the Tbolt's  averager 
working on the Middle bits.
All and all it works pretty good MOST of the time, except at major transfer 
points.
The  high resolution data interpretation does not work on the e revision 
sensor parts, so some of the later Tbolts show temp jumps of about 1 deg



As far as I know, Lady Heather does special averaging of the temperature 
data at two different times,
neither which apply to your case, so what you see is what the Tbolt is 
sending out.
LH will average the temperature data IF the display filter is turned on with 
F D 100 Enter, which yours is not, and
the LH's temperature controller has a special routine that cuts those 
spikes out (does not average them in) so that they do not upset LH's S/W 
temperature control PID loop .


ws

*

[time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

I left my Thunderbolt running with Lady Heather started. Returning after a 
few hours in the room,
which is at a constant temperature (underground, no heating, no air 
conditioning), I found the

following plot on the Lady Heather screen :

http://www.sdradio.eu/images/ladyheather.gif

which shows a narrow and pronounced peak in the temperature.

Does anybody have a possible explanation for this ?

TNX

73  Alberto  I2PHD 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Chuck Harris

Maybe a nearby cell phone calling home?

Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

If you watch the thermometer on the TBolt for long enough, you will indeed see
narrow temperature spikes. The gif you posted is a very typical spike. They are
fairly rare and they don't repeat. I believe LH averages the readings it gets, 
so
they may simply be a noise burst. The initial jump is the noise pop, and the 
decay
is the averaging taking it out.

Bob



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Could easily be. The spikes seem to be random and that would be a source of 
random RF.

Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Chuck Harris wrote:

 Maybe a nearby cell phone calling home?
 
 Bob Camp wrote:
 Hi
 
 If you watch the thermometer on the TBolt for long enough, you will indeed 
 see
 narrow temperature spikes. The gif you posted is a very typical spike. They 
 are
 fairly rare and they don't repeat. I believe LH averages the readings it 
 gets, so
 they may simply be a noise burst. The initial jump is the noise pop, and the 
 decay
 is the averaging taking it out.
 
 Bob
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Mark Sims

The spikes are due to an artifact in the way the Tbolt firmware reads the 
temperature sensor chip.  It reads two registers and combine the values to get 
a high-res temp reading.  But if the firmware accesses the registers in-between 
the time that the temp sensor chip updates them it can produce a bogus value.  
Typically this seems to happen on average of once every couple of hours.  

Lady Heather flags each spike with a red line at the top of the plot window.  
Other error events such as holdovers,  bad serial data, etc are flagged in the 
same way...  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Strange temperature peak

2011-05-27 Thread Arnold Tibus
Hello

In my case I think it's not a rf problem. I am far away from rf or cell
phone stations and the shack is well protected against rf from outside
and no cell phone nor other transmitters were used in this room at this
time. If it would be an emc problem - why is only the temperature output
affected?
I rather believe it is an internal digitizing problem, this chip is
specified to work with 0.5 deg. C steps, if I am not wrong, and the
higher resolution is achieved by a programming trick.

Arnold

Am 28.05.2011 03:59, schrieb Bob Camp:
 Hi
 
 Could easily be. The spikes seem to be random and that would be a source of 
 random RF.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On May 27, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Chuck Harris wrote:
 
 Maybe a nearby cell phone calling home?

 Bob Camp wrote:
 Hi

 If you watch the thermometer on the TBolt for long enough, you will indeed 
 see
 narrow temperature spikes. The gif you posted is a very typical spike. They 
 are
 fairly rare and they don't repeat. I believe LH averages the readings it 
 gets, so
 they may simply be a noise burst. The initial jump is the noise pop, and 
 the decay
 is the averaging taking it out.

 Bob

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.