Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread David J Taylor
For the real analog fans, how about a 1 Hz sinewave output and watch for the zero-crossings! G Precise? No! David -- SatSignal software - quality software written to your requirements Web: http://www.satsignal.eu Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/07/2012 02:16 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi When the customers started asking in the 1930's, generating a square wave at high frequency was not so easy…. Which is my point, the power of tradition can sometimes be stronger than logical reasoning for the application needs. Today many of the

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II questions

2012-02-07 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, I was thinking of trying a PICTIC II partial redesign with a Xilinx CPLD, using other type of fast turn off diodes and so on. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 19:55:36 -0900 (AKST) Richard H McCorkle mccor...@ptialaska.net wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/07/2012 05:58 AM, Hal Murray wrote: mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org said: Oh... nothing really beats it's what customers traditionally asks for Squarewave out provides high slew-rate which reduces the effect of additional noise. Right. But if you have a single frequency you can easily

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/07/2012 09:02 AM, David J Taylor wrote: For the real analog fans, how about a 1 Hz sinewave output and watch for the zero-crossings! G Precise? No! 11 uHz sine anyone, 24 hours period? Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] FE-.5680A trimming resolution

2012-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/07/2012 03:12 AM, Hal Murray wrote: mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org said: Not quite right. If you lock up the clock, you do not lock to the birds, but to GPS time or UTC as received over GPS. The observed time of the birds would be a bad solution since you can't see a particular bird

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Tom Van Baak
Or 23h 56m 4.091s /tvb 11 uHz sine anyone, 24 hours period? Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II questions

2012-02-07 Thread Hal Murray
att...@kinali.ch said: BTW: does anyone know how these days low cost FPGAs perform in terms of jitter? (the data sheets are kind of scarce in that regard). And how do they compare to state of the art ECL logic? Generally, not good. The general problem is that they have a lot of logic and a

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II questions

2012-02-07 Thread Azelio Boriani
To enhance the PICTIC II performance can step recovery diodes be used? Maybe the fast turn off can boost the switching capabilities of the interpolator for best resolution... On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: att...@kinali.ch said: BTW: does anyone

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II questions

2012-02-07 Thread David
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:28:14 +0100, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 19:55:36 -0900 (AKST) Richard H McCorkle mccor...@ptialaska.net wrote: While using a faster timebase or higher interpolator gain increases the resolution that doesn?t imply the accuracy will also

Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II questions

2012-02-07 Thread David
Step recovery diodes turn off fast but have a relatively long storage time. The fastest switched current integrators use schottky diodes. On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:06:55 +0100, Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@screen.it wrote: To enhance the PICTIC II performance can step recovery diodes be used?

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Thank goodness for that inertia. I can still cable up a 100Kcps sine wave standard to run stuff from long ago. When I run into a box that uses a T1 signal for a clock reference - not so easy in the basement. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com

[time-nuts] FE-5680A's suitability for use as a 10 MHz reference for microwave transverters

2012-02-07 Thread C. Turner
Hello, As has been mentioned here before, the output of the non-tunable FE-5680A's has been noted to have low-level spurs in it - no doubt due to the way the various frequency loops are derived within, some using DDS techniques. It is for this reason that when I packaged my FE-5680A in its

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A's suitability for use as a 10 MHz reference for microwave transverters

2012-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The phase noise of the FE's is not great, even inside +/- 3 KHz. To do an adequate job of cleaning them up, something like a 1 Hz loop bandwidth PLL would be needed. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of C. Turner

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A's suitability for use as a 10 MHz reference for micr...

2012-02-07 Thread EWKehren
Use a MV89 or something like it and lock it to the 5680A with a 10 to 100 Hz analog filter. You will like the results at 10 GHz. Bert Kehrenn In a message dated 2/7/2012 12:48:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tur...@ussc.com writes: Hello, As has been mentioned here before, the output of

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A's suitability for use as a 10 MHz reference for microwave transverters

2012-02-07 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
I am just finishing my promised stability and phase noise measurements on a batch of inexpensive Rb standards; I hope to publish the results tomorrow evening. In the meantime, I've looked at two of the FE-5680s and their phase noise is significantly worse than either the Efratom FRS or the

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Hal Murray
li...@rtty.us said: Thank goodness for that inertia. I can still cable up a 100Kcps sine wave standard to run stuff from long ago. When I run into a box that uses a T1 signal for a clock reference - not so easy in the basement. How much gear is there that uses T1 for a clock input? Is there

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/07/2012 08:12 PM, Hal Murray wrote: li...@rtty.us said: Thank goodness for that inertia. I can still cable up a 100Kcps sine wave standard to run stuff from long ago. When I run into a box that uses a T1 signal for a clock reference - not so easy in the basement. How much gear is there

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Albertson
Related question: Assuming I'm using 10MHz sine wave. What's the best physical cable to use? Is there any good reason to use 50 ohm cable? What about 75 ohm? I looked at a schematic of my counter and it looks like the 10MHz signal hits some high impedance chip inside.RG6 seems like

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:19:11 -0800 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Related question: Assuming I'm using 10MHz sine wave. What's the best physical cable to use? Is there any good reason to use 50 ohm cable? What about 75 ohm? I looked at a schematic of my counter and

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:59:18 +0100 Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Related question: Assuming I'm using 10MHz sine wave. What's the best physical cable to use? Is there any good reason to use 50 ohm cable? What about 75 ohm? I looked at a schematic of my counter and it looks

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500 Mike Naruta AA8K a...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: while TV and radio uses 75R. (there was once a reason for this, but i don't know it). A 4:1 balun takes old 300 ohm twinlead to 75 ohms. Thanks! This explains half it

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Azelio Boriani
Try this for a history about the 50 OHM impedance: http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/history-of-50-ohms.htm On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500 Mike Naruta AA8K a...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM,

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500 Mike Naruta AA8K a...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: while TV and radio uses 75R. (there was once a reason for this, but i don't know it). A 4:1 balun

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Roberto Barrios
50 ohms is a compromise between maximum power transfer and minimum attenuation, as mentioned in page 9 of Network Analyzer Basics (http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-7917E.pdf) Regards, Roberto EB4EQA -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
On 2/7/2012 4:30 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500 Mike Naruta AA8Ka...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: while TV and radio uses 75R. (there was once a reason for this, but i don't know it). A 4:1 balun takes old 300 ohm twinlead to

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi As long as you are running a sine wave, and you don't change cables, you can run just about anything. The phase errors / reflections will work themselves out. 50 ohm plastic dielectric cable turns out to be the best for power handling at reasonable loss. 75 ohm cable turns out to be the best

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: Addendum: Your counter input is mostlikely 50R. Even if it just enters a chip, as the chip itself should be matched to 50R. The input impedance should be noted in the manual of the counter. The counter specs say that any

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Jim Lux
On 2/7/12 1:30 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500 Mike Naruta AA8Ka...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:59 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: while TV and radio uses 75R. (there was once a reason for this, but i don't know it). A 4:1 balun takes old 300 ohm twinlead to 75

[time-nuts] 50 Ohm vs. 75 Ohm RF cable

2012-02-07 Thread Tom Miller
There is no particular advantage in one or the other, at least not for most applications. It's tradition that measurement and (most) RF gear uses 50R, while TV and radio uses 75R. (there was once a reason for this, but i don't know it). FYI, The reason there are two primary impedance's in

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Modern gear often has high input standard plugs. People tend to daisy chain gear with T connectors. That makes for issues if they are all low impedance. Bob On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:31 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Attila Kinali

Re: [time-nuts] 50 Ohm vs. 75 Ohm RF cable

2012-02-07 Thread lists
Just a FYI, the standard connectors for 75 and 50 ohms are a little different. I will leave it at that, but there is plenty of info on the net regarding the differences. --Original Message-- From: Tom Miller Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com To: time-nuts@febo.com ReplyTo: Tom Miller

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Rick Karlquist
Azelio Boriani wrote: Try this for a history about the 50 OHM impedance: http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/history-of-50-ohms.htm The reference is full of errors. The lowest loss in coax occurs when the ratio of the diameters is 3.6 to 1, regardless of dielectric. For air

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output?

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Spencer
A 10Mhz to T1 clock generator would be a cool project but in the event I were to need a standalone T1 clock source at home I'd probably just grab a CSU / DSU from ebay (or ask one of my former employers if they would let me acquire one from their junk pile) that could serve as clock generator.

[time-nuts] Using digital broadcast TV for timing?

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Albertson
GPS requires a good view of the sky, Hard to do in say the 7th floor of a 40 story building if you have no windows. I'm wondering about using the new digital TV signals for timing. I'm pretty sure there is time code in the signal and I'm pretty sure the bits are clocked at a very accurate

Re: [time-nuts] Why a 10MHz sinewave output

2012-02-07 Thread Chuck Harris
I think the real relation is 50 ohm coax is just 75 ohm air line with polyethylene dielectric added. -Chuck Harris Rick Karlquist wrote: Azelio Boriani wrote: Try this for a history about the 50 OHM impedance: http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/history-of-50-ohms.htm The reference

Re: [time-nuts] Using digital broadcast TV for timing?

2012-02-07 Thread Sam
You might be able to find the PCR clock at 90kHz, but.. PCR clocks are usually just decent oscillators, nothing special. GPS requires a good view of the sky, Hard to do in say the 7th floor of a 40 story building if you have no windows. I'm wondering about using the new digital TV

Re: [time-nuts] Using digital broadcast TV for timing?

2012-02-07 Thread David McGaw
The DTV signal coding has a major problem in that it is not deterministic - they can't even synchronize the audio and video. There have been many workshops on this at the Audio Engineering Society conventions. I doubt there is any useable timing in it. David McGaw At 09:01 PM 2/7/2012,

Re: [time-nuts] Using digital broadcast TV for timing?

2012-02-07 Thread Jim Lux
On 2/7/12 6:01 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: GPS requires a good view of the sky, Hard to do in say the 7th floor of a 40 story building if you have no windows. I'm wondering about using the new digital TV signals for timing. I'm pretty sure there is time code in the signal and I'm pretty sure

Re: [time-nuts] Using digital broadcast TV for timing?

2012-02-07 Thread Hal Murray
albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: The plan is to try and phase lock a local oscillator and use a very long time constant on the loop filter. I bet the TV transmitters are locked to GPS and over a long enough time are as good as GPS. Also in many cities there are many TV transmitters, should