Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Bob, On 09/06/2014 03:00 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Oddly enough (and yes it is odd) you can modulate an oscillator well outside the crystal’s bandwidth. The bigger issue is that the EFC does not pull the crystal very far on a normal OCXO. The FM modulation index drops to very small numbers

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input?

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi By far the most common way to check low level stuff on an OCXO is to measure it’s phase noise. There are a variety of approaches. The lowest cost approach is usually a dual oscillator into a mixer / quadrature lock. Feed the output to a preamp and then into some sort of audio spectrum

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Yes indeed, as you go below 1 Hz (or 1 radian/sec) all the things that “help” you roll off wise now hurt you. If you are worried about sidebands inside 1 Hz, you need to change a sign here and there. The only thing that saves you is that the noise floor is now coming up pretty fast. If

Re: [time-nuts] Update on my Arduino GPSDO / NTP server - going atomic

2014-09-06 Thread Andrew Rodland
Yes, the source is at http://github.com/arodland/Due-GPS-NTP-Server . It should be able to run just fine on the Due part of an Udoo, but you'll have to come up with a different arrangement for the Ethernet. One way would be to use chip-to-chip SPI to make the i.MX side of the Udoo act

Re: [time-nuts] Update on my Arduino GPSDO / NTP server - going atomic

2014-09-06 Thread Bill Dailey
Will add it to my list of projects. Will touch bases when I get close. Sent from my iPad On Sep 6, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Andrew Rodland and...@cleverdomain.org wrote: Yes, the source is at http://github.com/arodland/Due-GPS-NTP-Server . It should be able to run just fine on the Due part of an

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi Bob, Agreed. I often find that modulations eats your margin out. PWM is interesting in this regard. PWM has the property that the lowest frequency has the highest amplitude and the overtones then decay with 1/f from that. For a given clock rate, as you add a bit of PWM precision, you half

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi One of the easy things to do with PWM is to dither the LSB. That gives you one more bit of precision. It still keeps the main tone at the same place. Your worst case tone happens at 50% duty cycle (perfect square wave). If you do your 50/50 as a square wave at Fmax(not Fmin), your

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input?

2014-09-06 Thread Demian Martin
I have used an FM tuner pretty successfully to look at modulation and phase noise in oscillators. For a 10 MHz oscillator you will be looking at the 10th harmonic so modulation and phase noise is multiplied and much easier to see. You do need a square wave output to get a lot of harmonics.

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input?

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You get 20 log N multiplication in phase noise as you go up in frequency. On the 10th harmonic you will be 20 db higher than on the fundamental. With an OCXO running -160 to -170 dbc / Hz phase noise at the fundamental, you will be at -140 to -150 dbc / Hz at 100 MHz. If you are at -155 dbc

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi Bob, Indeed. The way to keep the MCU PWM doing reasonable stuff is to use a higher rate, and then update the PWM value in sync with the wrap-around, and then alter the value (dither or whatever) so that the average has higher precision. First degree sigma-delta is actually not a bad

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you are counting on your loop noise to spread your tones out - indeed not a good idea. There are several ways you can “go quiet” in your loop…. Bob On Sep 6, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: Hi Bob, Indeed. The way to keep the MCU PWM doing

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Bob, Agreed. I'm just saying that it goes static if you have PWM or something similar. As you see, there are many little details out there. Cheers, Magnus On 09/06/2014 08:30 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi If you are counting on your loop noise to spread your tones out - indeed not a good idea.

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Hal Murray
kb...@n1k.org said: The biggest problem comes from crystal spurs rather than crystal Q. What's the mechanism for making spurs with a crystal? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To

Re: [time-nuts] Update on my Arduino GPSDO / NTP server - going atomic

2014-09-06 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Andrew Rodland and...@cleverdomain.org wrote: 1. Should I try using the analog EFC to zero out the amount of correction I ask the X72's DDS for? Could reduce jitter in the timebase, could just add noise. I suppose I can test this one easily enough. Update on

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: What's the mechanism for making spurs with a crystal? Get the corners nice and pointy and strap it to a boot. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Voltage Input? (Bob Camp)

2014-09-06 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Simple answer = crystals are never perfect. Longer winded, but very incomplete answer = A spurious response in a crystal normally refers to a mode that is not one of the “identified” modes of the crystal. An AT has a set of identified modes, an SC has a more complex set of modes. In the