Re: [time-nuts] TrueTime AL-AK GPS receiver help

2015-05-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you want to dig into something like this to learn and to maybe fiddle with a 
downconverter design - sure, that’s a great thing to do. It’s a hobby and 
(hopefully) 
you are set up to handle the task. You probably are already a member of a list 
(or three)
where you have access to info on your project. 

Since we have zero info about the original requester, I am indeed guessing 
here. 
That can often be a bad thing to do. My *guess* is that this is somebody who
simply wants a working device. If so, there are a lot of bumps in the road that
they need to understand. If the answer is “I want a simple NTP server that is 
setup 
and forget”, this is probably not the way to go. 

Bob

 On May 1, 2015, at 9:55 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Bob brings up all the additional details that are the reality of dealing
 with teh older gear. Especially the date offsets because of the 1024 week
 cycle. That is a real pain.
 But the reason to spend time on something like this is to understand
 something and to learn.
 I picked up the austron 2000 gps because it was a useful rack mount box.
 Then realized some of its unique qualities. That was the driver for
 reviving it.
 I was lucky that I was able to obtain some operational data and then later
 schematics. BUT it was still a heck of a reverse engineering and adapting
 process.
 I am pretty sure I shared that on time-nuts and will guess that must be 5
 years ago now.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 I guess the first question would be:
 
 Are we sure it’s an AL-AK and not an XL-AK?
 
 Past that it becomes a fairly involved process of, is it worth real money
 to get this up and running?
 
 If we are talking about a $20 eBay find that is worth another $5 to have
 somebody else get it running, the
 conversation is a real short one.
 
 If the AL-AK has some inherent value (it’s a working GPS disciplined Cs
 maybe) then putting a few hundred
 dollars into checking it out and getting it running might make sense. If
 it’s like most of the parts from that
 era, the delta between getting it checked and getting it running is pretty
 small.
 
 Once you *do* have it running, what do you have?
 
 1) Leap second problems
 2) GPS year rollover problems
 3) Tracking issues
 4) A noisy receiver with very few correlators
 5) Software support issues
 
 This is an unusual box that is at least 20 years old. It *will* have at
 least some of the listed issues and
 may have all of them. Fixing them will be impossible.
 
 
 
 Why bring up all of the negatives? I for one have been sucked into this
 kind of thing a *lot* of times
 in the past. Just a few more this or that and it’ll be running fine. Much
 better to figure out the likely
 cost and outcome first. That’s *very* hard to do, and even harder to
 follow through on. If you can’t
 do the work yourself, the cost isn’t just lost time. This can cost real
 cash.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:
 
 I received this email. Anyone have a good answer?
 Thanks,
 /tvb
 
 --
 Someone on ebay advised me to contact your website in hopes that someone
 in your organization can help me with my TrueTime model AL-AK GPS Receiver.
 I need to send it to someone so that they can check it to see if it works
 and can track Satellites.  This receiver has the onboard up/down convertor
 board that changes the receiver input frequency which is set at 4.092 MHz.
 I don't have the needed down converter at the antenna. I bought this
 receiver on ebay from someone who told me that he doesn't have the down
 converter as well and can't figure out how to get it to work at 1575.42
 MHz. He also didn't know if this receiver can be setup for a 1575.42 MHz by
 removing the onboard converter and changing some DIP switches. If one of
 your members can at least check out the receiver at 4.092 MHz for satellite
 tracking That would be a big help ...
 --
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] TrueTime AL-AK GPS receiver help

2015-05-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Remember - a number of these boxes go *way* back in time GPS wise. Often the 
basic guts were a mix and match affair and this or that sub-system 
was frozen for a decade or more. At this late date, figuring out why they did 
that, or why they had multiple sub-systems is going to be tough. I suspect
that it goes something like - this one works with 1500’ of RG-58, that one 
works with 300’ of RG-58.

In answer to your basic question - I’d bet it has the IF to a GPS receiver and 
the tuned front end is up at the antenna. I have never seen one of these 
that was an either or as installed. If you wanted a downconverter, that’s what 
they built into the box. If you wanted a full receiver, that went in instead. 
They flipped a few dip switches on the main board to tell the firmware what it 
had and moved on.

Bob


 On May 2, 2015, at 12:10 AM, Al Wolfe alw.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Does this AL-AK have a real GPS receiver in it? Does the unit have a board 
 with a crystal of 16.368MHz. that is multiplied by 96 up to 1571.328, the 
 mixing frequency to get to the GPS freq of 1575.42?
 
   Since the down convert-up convert is offered as an option perhaps TrueTime 
 used an actual GPS receiver in all their units. It stands to reason (at least 
 to me) using a stock off-the-shelf GPS receiver in all their boxes would be 
 simpler than having to do a custom kluge to work at 4 mhz.
 
   If this user can find out if his box has an actual GPS receiver then the 
 converter section could probably be bypassed.
 
   FWIW, the TrueTime XL-AK used an external up converter and down converter, 
 model 142-6150. Says it's good for up to 1500 feet of RG58. Its manual is on 
 line. It uses the above mixing scheme.
 
 Al, retired, mostly
 AKA k9si
 
 
 Someone on ebay advised me to contact your website in hopes that someone in 
 your organization can help me with my TrueTime model AL-AK GPS Receiver. I 
 need to send it to someone so that they can check it to see if it works and 
 can track Satellites.  This receiver has the onboard up/down convertor board 
 that changes the receiver input frequency which is set at 4.092 MHz. I don't 
 have the needed down converter at the antenna. I bought this receiver on 
 ebay from someone who told me that he doesn't have the down converter as 
 well and can't figure out how to get it to work at 1575.42 MHz. He also 
 didn't know if this receiver can be setup for a 1575.42 MHz by removing the 
 onboard converter and changing some DIP switches. If one of your members can 
 at least check out the receiver at 4.092 MHz for satellite tracking That 
 would be a big help ...
 snip 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Important parameters for a GPS/GNSS antenna

2015-05-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Obviously this becomes a “that depends” sort of question. For timing, you 
probably can 
do a fine job with an antenna that nukes everything below 20 degrees to the 
horizon. That
*assumes* that you have a good enough view that it does not pull to many sat’s 
out of your population 
*and* that you already know your location. 

Phase / delay stability over temperature would be an interesting thing to look 
at. Probably not a big deal on 
a simple antenna. It might be an issue as the antenna interacts with the preamp 
and filter.

Bob

 On May 2, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org 
 wrote:
 
 Attila,
 
 On 04/29/2015 10:43 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
 Moin,
 
 I recently discovered openEMS[1], which is, very simply put, a fancy
 antenna simulator. I played a little with it and thought about
 trying to optimize an GPS patch antenna design for timing use.
 
 Will take it for a test-drive to see how it align up to NEC2 and variants.
 
 But I had to discover that I actually do not know what to optimze for.
 There are many paramters I can think of (RHCP/LHCP, symmetry of
 gain, feedpoint impedance vs frequency, stability of phase centre,)
 which all seem to be to some extend important, but which ones do actually
 matter for the timing reference performance?
 
 My google skills failed to locate any relevant documents on this topic.
 
 Could someone be so kind and give me some pointers, what to search
 for, documents or the like?
 
 The thing that we care about is:
 
 1) LHCP surpression
 2) Directivity/ surpression of signals below say 5 degrees above horizon
 3) Phase stability with regard to azimuth/elevation
 4) Relatively flat gain above 5 degrees
 
 Do read up on the Novatel pinwheels, as they illustrate the various concerns 
 and how they do that in a new fashion.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Important parameters for a GPS/GNSS antenna

2015-05-02 Thread Tom Van Baak
 A tri-band antenna design is... uh.. difficult.
 At the moment I am just playing with some software. Yes, I might
 end up with something that resembles an antenna design. But with my level of
 knowledge getting a good single band antenna would be already quite
 some feat. Designing a multi-band antenna is way out of my league.
 
 Attila Kinali

Hi Attila,

One other consideration is that for high-end positioning and timing use, an 
accurate characterization of a given antenna is more important than trying to 
achieve a perfect antenna. When you post-process raw GPS data you get to 
include antenna phase center / gain / az/el corrections for free. This means 
the goal is not so much a perfect antenna design, but an antenna whose 
imperfections are well-known.

Here are a dozen random GPS antenna calibration links to keep you busy for 
today:

National Geodetic Survey Absolute Antenna Calibrations
http://www.gps.gov/cgsic/meetings/2010/bilich.pdf

Leica GNSS Reference Antennas - White Paper
http://www.leica-geosystems.com/downloads123/zz/nrs/general/white-tech-paper/Leica_Reference_Antennas_Whitepaper_TPA_en.pdf

A Novel GPS Survey Antenna
http://www.meridware.com.tw/Documents/Papers/gps600antenna.pdf

Tests of phase center variations of various GPS antennas, and some results
ftp://geodesy.noaa.gov/pub/abilich/oldPC/Documents/antcal/calibPapers/Schmitz2002.pdf

GPS ANTENNA CALIBRATION AT THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY
https://www.fig.net/pub/fig2008/ppt/ts05g/ts05g_02_weston_mader_ppt_2857.pdf

A New Approach for Field Calibration of Absolute Antenna Phase Center Variations
http://www.geopp.com/pdf/ion96.pdf

ANTENNA PHASE CENTER VARIATIONS CORRECTIONS IN PROCESSING
OF GPS OBSERVATIONS WITH USE OF COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE
http://www.uwm.edu.pl/wnt/technicalsc/tech_13/B12.PDF

Phase center variations problem in GPS/GLONASS observations processing
http://leidykla.vgtu.lt/conferences/ENVIRO_2014/Articles/5/202_Dawidowicz.pdf

Calibration of antenna-radome and monument-multipath effect of
GEONET—Part 1: Measurement of phase characteristics
http://svr4.terrapub.co.jp/journals/EPS/pdf/2001/5301/53010013.pdf

Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas
http://www.dgfi.tum.de/media/jahresbericht/publications/4558dbb6f6f8bb2e16d03b85bde76e2c.pdf

Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered 
Antenna Array 
http://navsys.com/Papers/0309002.pdf

/tvb

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Important parameters for a GPS/GNSS antenna

2015-05-02 Thread Magnus Danielson

Attila,

On 04/29/2015 10:43 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Moin,

I recently discovered openEMS[1], which is, very simply put, a fancy
antenna simulator. I played a little with it and thought about
trying to optimize an GPS patch antenna design for timing use.


Will take it for a test-drive to see how it align up to NEC2 and variants.


But I had to discover that I actually do not know what to optimze for.
There are many paramters I can think of (RHCP/LHCP, symmetry of
gain, feedpoint impedance vs frequency, stability of phase centre,)
which all seem to be to some extend important, but which ones do actually
matter for the timing reference performance?

My google skills failed to locate any relevant documents on this topic.

Could someone be so kind and give me some pointers, what to search
for, documents or the like?


The thing that we care about is:

1) LHCP surpression
2) Directivity/ surpression of signals below say 5 degrees above horizon
3) Phase stability with regard to azimuth/elevation
4) Relatively flat gain above 5 degrees

Do read up on the Novatel pinwheels, as they illustrate the various 
concerns and how they do that in a new fashion.


Cheers,
Magnus
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] DDS, OCXO and ADEV

2015-05-02 Thread d0ct0r


Hello,


I would like to create some charts for ADEV for following setup:

HP5386A counter connected to External REF. (OCXO). The input of counter 
connected to my DDS VFO. The frequency on VFO is 2853000 Hz.


Here is what I got from counter via GPIB:

S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082409E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082409E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7
S +3.505082408E-7

I converted it to following form:

0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240800
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900
0.00350508240900

Then I tried to use ADEV by tvb (long life to Tom!). See attached file 
1b.bmp


And I tried to create the charts for the collected data. See attached 
file 1a.bmp.


But it seems I am doing something wrong. Any advises will be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks !



--
WBW,

V.P.___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.