Yes. The device supports a SCPI command set. The next version of Lady
Heather supports it... well at least my modified Z3812A does.
You probably don't need an RS422 converter. You can cobble an RS-232
connection into the RS-422 port. This usually works, but some hardware serial
ports
Hi,
Regarding the Lucent box- I wanted to let everyone know that once it locked to
satellites, I have a 10 MHz out.
The output was a square wave with some ringing, but I built a three element low
pass filter and now I have a really nice 10 MHz sine wave.
Thanks to all!
Last question I
Pardon my lack of knowledge regarding Lady Heather, what is the x-axis
scale? I assumed the text line above the plot is the various y-axis scales.
This is good data. Thanks
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016, Mark Sims > wrote:
>
Hi bob, thank you for the polite response regarding rise time, indeed I
would fully agree.
The rise time I was referring to was the DAC efc value in the plot mark had
previously attached. He just included a second plot as well. It would
appear the tbolt is doing something else aggressively before
Lars:
Thank you very much, your explanation was very helpful. I unfortunately don't
have a background in electronics other than at a hobbyist level, and really
should just lurk in the back as many of the topics discussed are way above me,
but I am learning . So forgive this obvious and perhaps
Okee dokeee... here it is. Not much difference. The initial step is
smaller, but it still spikes. After that things are pretty much the same.
After it cool down, I'm doing another run with the initial voltage set to the
peak of the spike.
One slight difference was with the new
Hi
The rise time of the edge is not a good measure of the accuracy of the timing It
simply is a way to look at how fast your gate can ramp a signal.
If you do a long term comparison of the frequency vs time and the time error vs
time
you will see that a tight (small) damping keeps the time
Hi
A more significant issue with the output of the TBolt for direct microwave
multiplication
is the spurs on the output. When multiplied up to > 1 GHz, these are going to
be a major
issue. There are a lot of conventional techniques for taking care of this. If
you have not
already employed
Bob, that is an excellent proof by contradiction. The reason I asked is on
the plot Mark shared that first rising edge is pretty sharp for a system
with a 500 s time constant.
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> The pps sync is done by resetting the counter
On 9/13/16 2:35 PM, Andy ZL3AG wrote:
That sounds like fun!
Do they have a mailing list they hang out on?
yes.. amateur-dsn
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/amateur-DSN/info
https://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html
On 14/09/2016, at 5:04 AM, Mike Baker wrote:
Hello, Time-Nutters--
Hi
The pps sync is done by resetting the counter that generates the PPS. At a 1
ppm frequency
offset, it could take 500,000 seconds to steer it in with the OCXO. It unlikely
people would wait
for over a week for the PPS to line up ….
Bob
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Scott Stobbe
Just shipped out three new systems for $DAY_JOB to Goldstone, Madrid and
Canberra.
Love it when work and time nuts intersect.
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 17:35, Andy ZL3AG wrote:
>
>
> That sounds like fun!
>
> Do they have a mailing list they hang out on?
>
>
Interesting discussion about startup. At startup the phase error of the
synthesized PPS is +- 0.5 s. Is this coarsely set to the nearest ocxo cycle
once gps time is established (would make sense to do it this way), or is
the half second recovered steering the ocxo?
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016,
That sounds like fun!
Do they have a mailing list they hang out on?
https://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html
On 14/09/2016, at 5:04 AM, Mike Baker wrote:
> Hello, Time-Nutters--
>
> Full disclosure-- I am a complete newbie at understanding the
> intricacies of generating a really stable, low
On 9/13/2016 12:42 PM, Nick Wagner wrote:
Hi to time nuts.. This source has been mentioned before. I purchased a unit
several months after seeing it recommended. It is made by Leo Bodnar
Electronics in England. It is
The simplest way to get a very clean 10 MHz sq wave. I have only observed
the
Can anybody say more about the integrator term in the Tbolt? In the Arduino
GPSDO I have, I use 1/TC/TC/damping and use damping = 2. I see Nick Sayer do
the same but use damping 1.75. Simulations I have done in Excel seems to
indicate that a damping in my sense of about 3 could be better to
As I have understood it the change of VCXO gain is the reason that R2-C2 can be
omitted. With the VCXO with a large span the damping is needed otherwise it
will oscillate.
The XOR phase detector has a range of 50us with 10kHz in. The VCXO has maybe a
span of 30ppm (us/s) and with R1-C1 time
Hi to time nuts.. This source has been mentioned before. I purchased a unit
several months after seeing it recommended. It is made by Leo Bodnar
Electronics in England. It is
The simplest way to get a very clean 10 MHz sq wave. I have only observed
the 10 MHz on a scope .. have no other reference
On Tue, September 13, 2016 2:24 pm, taylor david wrote:
> Briefly, Mike, there's an easy to use unit here, which takes a puck GPS
> antenna and can run off USB +5V:
>
> http://www.leobodnar.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info_id=234
Mike already mentioned he has a Thunderbolt. That
Mark wrote:
I just ran a tbolt (which has been off for a couple of months) and logged the
state for a couple of hours... and then remembered something about the initial
DAC value setting that I had figured out long ago... it has little to nothing
to do with oscillator disciplining.The
On 9/13/16 10:04 AM, Mike Baker wrote:
Hello, Time-Nutters--
Full disclosure-- I am a complete newbie at understanding the
intricacies of generating a really stable, low phase noise, accurate
frequency reference for microwave reception up around the 8 GHz
DSN (Deep Space Network) band. I have
> Hello, Time-Nutters--
>
> Full disclosure-- I am a complete newbie at understanding the
> intricacies of generating a really stable, low phase noise, accurate
> frequency reference for microwave reception up around the 8 GHz
> DSN (Deep Space Network) band. I have been following the back
>
Hello, Time-Nutters--
Full disclosure-- I am a complete newbie at understanding the
intricacies of generating a really stable, low phase noise, accurate
frequency reference for microwave reception up around the 8 GHz
DSN (Deep Space Network) band. I have been following the back
and forth
23 matches
Mail list logo