Hi Simon,
On 29/10/14 20:15, Simon Marsh wrote:
This is a fairly long post, at the top is a bit of description of of
changes since my last posts and then around the middle is some
description of the data thats attached. The data raises a few questions,
and I'll put those in a separate post.
On 30/10/2014 07:12, Iain Young wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 29/10/14 20:15, Simon Marsh wrote:
This is a fairly long post, at the top is a bit of description of of
changes since my last posts and then around the middle is some
description of the data thats attached. The data raises a few questions,
original post had a lot of attachments, these have been uploaded here
for viewing:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzvFGRfj4aFkMFBtNWFSZVBKWkkusp=sharing
---
This is a fairly long post, at the top is a bit of description of of
changes since my last posts and then around the middle is
Hi
It is not at all unusual for signals to be re-clocked when going into a micro.
Often the documentation on this process is somewhere between vague and
non-exsistant.
Bob
On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Simon Marsh subscripti...@burble.com wrote:
This is a fairly long post, at the top is a
On 29/10/2014 22:22, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
It is not at all unusual for signals to be re-clocked when going into a micro.
Often the documentation on this process is somewhere between vague and
non-exsistant.
Bob
Yes, luckily the Sitra TRM has a nice clear diagram for the mechanism I
use and
Hi
In the case of a 1 ps aperture on the flip flop, and a 100 fs delta between
samples, there are two simple things that might happen:
1) You get random garbage for 10 counts.
2) The flip flop “hangs up” for 10 counts.
To know which one you are going to get, you would need a pretty good
kb...@n1k.org said:
It is not at all unusual for signals to be re-clocked when going into a
micro. Often the documentation on this process is somewhere between vague
and non-exsistant.
Reclocking is almost required if you want to avoid metastability issues.
There is often some
