Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-22 Thread Chris Albertson
Seems the problem is possible asymmetry in the speed of network connections. You really can not detect this with simple pings. But what if you send 100MB messages?Even using NTP at the tens of millisecond level you can measure the one way speed accurately if the message is long enough.

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-22 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:23:23 -0800 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Seems the problem is possible asymmetry in the speed of network connections. You really can not detect this with simple pings. But what if you send 100MB messages?Even using NTP at the tens of

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-22 Thread pablo alvarez
I would not fully trust NTP, and as already explained taking your GPS outside as a reference for just a while is not really going to help. But..why not using GPS inside the building? Some receivers are quite sensitive, so probably you will not need an external antenna to pick up a signal. Probably

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-22 Thread Azelio Boriani
Moreover most of actual GPS receivers are indoor capable (once got a lock with the antenna outside). I have briefly tested the uBlox and the NavSync for this feature and it works as expected. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:52 AM, pablo alvarez pabloalvarezsanc...@gmail.com wrote: I would not fully

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Bob Camp
Of Chris Albertson Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 9:57 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration? Even with a very minimal local Ethernet where the path is the same for every packet you still have variable

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: Hi The only saving feature on a local LAN is that you get to run a *lot* of data if you wish to. Also, by definition a local LAN does not have a router. BTW, Is the O.P. still here? I wonder if he is re-thinking his

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Mark Spencer
...@kinali.ch wrote: From: Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration? To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Received: Tuesday, February 21, 2012, 1:47 PM On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:05:04 -0800 Chris

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: If you read carefully what the OP wrote, you'll see that he wants to measure one way trips. Yes, just like the swim coach who wants to measure the swimmer doing one length of the pool. He uses a stop watch, Not two

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Hal Murray
albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: Now we can move the discussion to measuring the speed of the backwards channel with some method better than just taking 1/2 the round trip. The way to do that is to get a good clock on both systems. That puts us back in the chicken-egg business. -- These

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Feb 21, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Mark Spencer wrote: Perhaps another way to approach this problem would be to see if there are entities and or individuals who already have precision time keeping equipment (or at least access to GPS antennas) who

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 What if one sends a message one way that triggers say, 10 response messages 1 second apart. Then you get distribution statistics on the return path. You still don't know what the absolute forward or reverse path time was, of course. Yes,

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-21 Thread Bill Woodcock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: BTW, Is the O.P. still here? I wonder if he is re-thinking his requirements. The requirement is to do one-way delay measurements. The requirement isn't changing. I'm just here to educate

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-20 Thread Tom Van Baak
I think a box that can't get some external source of time in three years is one that we can pretty well write off as lost. Thank you (several of you, actually) for the clear explanation of the math. http://www.msc-ge.com/en/news/pressroom/manu/1241-www/3567-www.html

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-20 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, the relation frequency_drift- time_error seems difficult to figure out. I see this misunderstanding daily here at work and haven't yet found a way to explain to my colleagues. I have already used: integral, area, count accumulation but none worked. On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tom Van

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-19 Thread WB6BNQ
Hello Bill Woodcock, Many, many questions come to mind. Is this a fixed network that never changes its character ? Or by network do you mean via the internet where you have no control over path variations ? I guess the latter based upon your comments thus far. What is driving the

Re: [time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board levelintegration?

2012-02-19 Thread SAIDJACK
In a message dated 2/19/2012 21:21:35 Pacific Standard Time, wb6...@cox.net writes: Doing a few fixes for 30 minutes will, under best conditions, get you somewhere on a circumference around your location with a radius of 15 meters (50 feet). For GPS to get a useful coordinate result with